Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise(310)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • SEPA noise legal challenge support pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP SEPA Draft EIS Noise Analysis Deficiency — Inadequate Metric and Health Impact Assessment

    Formal SEPA comment filed 2026-05-28 by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, challenging the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Draft Environmental Impact Statement noise analysis as legally insufficient under WAC 197-11-794. Argues the Port Of Seattle improperly imported the FAA’s 1.5 dB/65 DNL significance threshold wholesale from NEPA, substituting it for Washington’s required multi-factor significance standard covering magnitude,
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Noise, SAMP, SEPA, WAC
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement — Health Effects of Aviation Noise: Deficiencies and Corrections

    A Des Moines resident submitted a formal comment arguing that the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement (SAMP EIS) significantly underestimates the health risks of aviation noise by omitting key peer-reviewed studies linking aircraft noise to cardiovascular disease, heart structural changes, and sleep disruption. The commenter contends that the EIS relies on outdated and methodologically flawed research, particularly FICAN studies using extrapolated rather than measured data, while ignoring more recent findings from the WHO, the HYENA Project, and a 2025 cardiac MRI study. The comment calls on the FAA to conduct a proper cumulative health effects analysis and require additional noise mitigation measures beyond the current DNL 65 dB contour threshold.
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, Health, Noise, SAMP
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment of Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP Draft EIS Noise Analysis Deficiency — Inadequate Metric and Health Impact Assessment

    A Des Moines resident's formal comment argues that the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement's noise analysis is legally inadequate because it relies solely on a federal FAA noise threshold rather than Washington State's own multi-factor significance standard. The comment contends that the standard noise metric used (DNL) masks the real impact of roughly 96 additional daily flights projected by 2037, since it averages out individual disturbance events rather than counting them. The commenter calls for supplemental analysis using alternative metrics—such as single-event sound levels and nighttime averages—supported by peer-reviewed health studies linking aircraft noise to sleep disruption and cardiovascular harm.
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, NEPA, Noise, SAMP, SAMP Draft SEPA EIS, SEPA, WAC, WHO
  • SAMP EIS noise comment formatted pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement — Health Effects of Aviation Noise: Deficiencies and Corrections

    Formal public comment filed 2026-05-28 by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, on the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), challenging the No Significant Impact (NSI) finding on health effects of aviation noise. Bogen argues the SAMP EIS and ME Eagan Consulting report omit key peer-reviewed studies including the WHO Systematic Review Update (2022) on
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, Health, Noise, SAMP
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP SEPA Draft EIS Noise Analysis Deficiency — Inadequate Metric and Health Impact Assessment

    Des Moines resident Jeffrey Bogen submitted a formal comment arguing that the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement's noise analysis is legally inadequate because it relies solely on a federal average-noise metric (DNL) rather than Washington State's broader, multi-factor significance standard. Bogen contends that with roughly 96 additional flights per day projected by 2037, residents will experience more frequent individual noise disruptions — including sleep disturbance and cardiovascular stress — that the DNL metric is mathematically incapable of detecting. He calls on the Port of Seattle to supplement its Final EIS with event-level and nighttime noise metrics supported by peer-reviewed health research, including the FAA's own National Sleep Study.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Noise, SAMP, SEPA, WAC
  • SAMP public comment flyer SEPA 2026
    2026-05-22

    SAMP: the unsustainable airport master plan – 2026 pre-open house hero

    Advocacy flyer opposing the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), characterizing it as the 'UnSustainable Airport Master Plan' and warning of one-third more flights, noise, and pollution with no mitigation or compensation. Public comment is noted as beginning May 22, 2026, with resources listed at stni.info/samp/ and sea-tacnoise.info.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Environmental Impact Statement, Noise, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • SAMP public comment flyer SEPA 2026 square
    2026-05-22

    SAMP – the unsustainable airport master plan

    Advocacy flyer from Sea-Tac Noise.Info opposing the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), characterizing it as the 'UnSustainable Airport Master Plan' and warning of one-third more flights, noise, and pollution with no mitigation or compensation. The flyer directs the public to subscribe at stni.info/samp/ and notes that public comment opens May 22, 2026.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Environmental Impact Statement, Noise, Port Of Seattle, SAMP
  • 634447191 26140442278976531 5191433782839792025 n
    2026-05-08

    It All Adds Up Sea Change – Deploying Underwater Tech To Study How Noise Affects Marine Life

    A Port of Seattle promotional image featuring a dolphin or orca dorsal fin breaking the surface of calm water, with mountains visible in the background. The image promotes the Port's deployment of underwater technology to study how noise affects marine life, under their 'It All Adds Up Sea Change' environmental initiative.
    TagsEnvironment, Marine, Noise, Port Of Seattle
  • Noisequest 2color edited
    2026-04-28

    Noisequest logo

    Logo for NOISE (Neighbors Opposed to Irritating and Stressful Environments), a community advocacy organization concerned with airport noise. The logo features bold blue block letters spelling 'NOISE' with a stylized blue commercial airplane graphic integrated into the design.
    TagsAcademic Journals, Noise, University Of Washington
  • Start aviationnoiseworkinggroup meetingsummary february 9, 2026 final pdf
    2026-02-09

    StART Aviation Noise Working Group Meeting Summary — February 9, 2026

    The StART Aviation Noise Working Group met in February 2025 to review Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Late Night Noise Limitation Program, which tracks aircraft noise between midnight and 5 AM and found 8% of operations exceeded thresholds in Q4 2025. The group decided against expanding the program to cover 11 PM–midnight, as most flights in that hour already use quieter aircraft and the change would triple monitored operations with little noise-reduction benefit. Additional updates covered a significant drop in propeller aircraft turns over Burien, progress on the Sound Insulation Program, and action items including a new 5–6 AM operations analysis and a multi-year trends chart.
    CategoriesMeetings TagsNoise, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Sound Insulation, StART

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 … Page 31
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Laguardia airport title 14 code of federal regulations (cfr) part 150 final noise exposure map report" — , 2017

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V