Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise Remedy Program(52)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1984-02-22

    Airport Noise Remedy Update–Jackson International Airport

    In February 1984, the Port of Seattle sent an update to concerned citizens about proposed noise remedy programs near Jackson International Airport (Sea-Tac), including land acquisition, purchase assurance, and sound insulation initiatives. A subcommittee recommended expanding the program boundaries to cover 275 additional residences under purchase assurance and 44 more under land acquisition, with criteria addressing airport-related development buffers and neighborhood continuity. The Port Commission was scheduled to review these recommendations at a Staff Review Session on February 28, 1984.
    TagsJoe Sims, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Program, Noise Remedy Update, Port Of Seattle, Sound Insulation
  • POS pac memo april 23, 1982 seatac noise remedy program update scope of work pdf
    1982-04-23

    Memorandum to Policy Advisory Committee: Scope of Work for the Sea-Tac Noise Remedy Program Update

    April 23, 1982 memorandum from Art Yoshioka, Special Project Director at Port Of Seattle, to the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) outlining the scope of work for the Sea-Tac Noise Remedy Program Update. Evaluates three planning strategies differentiated by phasing: Strategy 1 (24-month single phase), Strategy 2 (two phases, 12-month first phase), and Strategy 3 (two
    TagsNoise Remedy Program, PAC, Policy Advisory Committee, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1982-04-23

    Memorandum to Policy Advisory Committee: Scope of Work for the Sea-Tac Noise Remedy Program Update

    A 1982 Port of Seattle memorandum from Special Project Director Art Yoshioka outlines the scope of work for the Sea-Tac Noise Remedy Program Update, which aimed to address aircraft noise impacts on surrounding communities. Three planning strategies were evaluated, and the third was selected for its ability to complete an initial land acquisition phase within eight months—faster than the 12- or 24-month timelines of the alternatives. The chosen approach prioritized quickly acquiring properties in noise-impacted areas not yet covered by existing programs, fulfilling prior commitments to affected communities near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsNoise Remedy Program, PAC, Policy Advisory Committee, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1982-01-01

    Noise Remedy Update Org Chart Airport Citizen Participation Program 1982-1990 0001

    A hand-drawn organizational chart outlining the Proposed Framework for the Sea-Tac Airport Citizen Participation Program, centered on the Noise Remedy Update (1982–1984) administered by the Technical Working Committee and POS Planning & Research Dept. The framework branches into four programs—Acquisition Program (1985–90), Demonstration Program (1985–87), Highline Plan Update (1985–87), and Noise Abatement Program (1985→)—all feeding into a Forum coordinated by the POS Public Information Department.
    TagsAirport Citizen Participation Program, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Program, Noise Remedy Update, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1979-08-29

    Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport: Zone Three Committee Q&A Newsletter, August 29, 1979

    A 1979 letter from Sea-Tac International Airport Manager Oris Dunham, Jr. to the Zone Three Committee accompanies a newsletter addressing community questions about airport operations and noise impact. The document explains key programs including the Interim Land Acquisition Program (approved 1974) to purchase properties within FAA-established flight path zones, and the federally funded Airport Development Assistance Program (ADAP), which draws from airline ticket taxes to fund noise remedy efforts. It also references the Sunset Recreational Plan, a coordinated initiative between the Port of Seattle and King County to address land use in the airport's north clear zone.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsADAP, Noise Remedy Program, Oris Dunham, Port Of Seattle, Zone 3 Committee
  • Port of seattle zone three committee qa newsletter august 29, 1979 pdf
    1979-08-29

    Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport: Zone Three Committee Q&A Newsletter, August 29, 1979

    Letter dated August 29, 1979 from Oris Dunham Jr., Airport Manager, Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport, to the Zone Three Committee at ERAC Building, 156th and Ambaum, enclosing a newsletter responding to questions raised at the July 24, 1979 Zone Three Committee meeting. The newsletter addresses: land purchases under flight paths, the Interim Land
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsADAP, Noise Remedy Program, Oris Dunham, Port Of Seattle, Zone 3 Committee
  • 1979-08-17

    Letter to King County Council Regarding North Sea-Tac Park Recreation Area

    In an August 17, 1979 letter to the King County Council, Irene Jones, chairperson of Zone 3 meetings, conveyed strong opposition from local residents to developing a recreational park in the North Sea-Tac area near the airport. Attendees at a public meeting cited safety concerns, high noise levels, and potential tax burdens as reasons against the park plan, arguing that the land should first be fully acquired by the POS before any development is considered. Residents emphasized that their top priority was relief through noise-acquisition, purchase assurance, and sound insulation programs for their existing properties.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, King County, King County Council, Noise Remedy Program, North Sea-Tac Park, Sea-Tac Airport, Zone 3 Committee
  • 1979 08 17 zone3 letter north seatac park recreation opposition pdf
    1979-08-17

    Letter to King County Council Regarding North Sea-Tac Park Recreation Area

    Letter dated August 17, 1979 from Irene Jones, chairperson of Zone 3 meetings, to King County Council members Paul Barden and R.R. Bob Greive, expressing community opposition to the North Sea-Tac Park recreation area development. Residents of an aircraft noise-impacted community who attended a public Zone 3 area meeting on August 16, 1979 at the
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, King County, King County Council, Noise Remedy Program, North Sea-Tac Park, Sea-Tac Airport, Zone 3 Committee
  • 1979-07-24

    Zone 3 Community Meeting Attendee List, July 24, 1979

    This document contains handwritten sign-in sheets and contact lists from a Zone 3 Community Meeting held on Tuesday, July 24, 1979, at the ERAC Building (156th & Ambaum), focused on noise remedy programs and land use in the North Acres area near Sea-Tac Airport. Attendees included Port of Seattle officials such as Airport Manager Otis Dunham, Director of Public Information Dave Warmuth, Planner Joe Sims, and King County Community Planner Dave Baugh, along with numerous local residents. The sheets record names, addresses, and phone numbers of participants, reflecting community engagement with airport noise and land-use concerns in the Seattle/Des Moines area during the late 1970s.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Land Use, Noise Remedy Program, Port Of Seattle, Zone 3 Committee
  • Zone 3 community meeting attendees 1979 07 24 pdf
    1979-07-24

    Zone 3 Community Meeting Attendee List, July 24, 1979

    Handwritten attendee sign-in sheets for a Zone 3 Community Meeting held July 24, 1979 at the ERAC Building, 156th and Anbaum, at 2:30 PM. Topics listed include Noise Remedy Programs and Land Use in the North Acres area. Attendees include Ed Parks (Port of Seattle), Jim Branch (Port of Seattle Sea-Tac Aviation Dept.), Oris Dunham
    Tagscommunity engagement, Land Use, Noise Remedy Program, Port Of Seattle, Zone 3 Committee

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Why the Port Of Seattle’s 3rd runway EIS fails adequately to examine impacts to wetlands and prescribes inadequate mitigation" — , 1997

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V