Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMechanically Stabilized Earth(42)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR053223: Effect of Shear Modulus on Deformations and Reinforcing Stresses of MSE Walls — Third Runway Project

    Memorandum dated December 20, 2001 from Michael Bailey, P.E. and Reda A. Mikhail, P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E. of HNTB Corporation regarding AR053223, project 4798-40. Analyzes sensitivity of MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall design to variations in soil shear modulus under dynamic/seismic loading for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport,
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR052350: Geotechnical Summary Report — Third Runway Embankment and MSE Retaining Walls, STIA

    Hart Crowser, Inc. geotechnical summary report prepared for the Port of Seattle for presentation to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Seattle District), dated November 2, 2001, project number 4978-06. Covers design of the Third Runway embankment and three mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls (50–135 feet height) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Addresses 17,000,000
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR018323: Geotechnical Summary Report — Third Runway Embankment and MSE Retaining Walls, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Hart Crowser geotechnical summary report (project 4978-06) prepared for the Port of Seattle for presentation to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, November 2, 2001. Covers Third Runway embankment construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: 17,000,000 cubic yards compacted earth fill, maximum fill thickness 165 feet, 2H:1V side slopes, three Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) retaining walls
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH 454: Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Support ACC Motion Stay Section 401 Cert No. 1996-4-02325

    This 2001 declaration from civil and environmental engineer Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed with Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, supports the Airport Communities Coalition's motion to halt construction of a proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Dr. Lucia, a principal with GeoSyntec Consultants, outlines his review of geotechnical and seismic concerns related to the runway's embankment fill and MSE retaining walls. The declaration references multiple technical letters submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising safety and environmental questions about the project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR021838: GeoSyntec Comments Third Runway Embankment Fill & West MSE Wall – ACC Technical Review Letter

    In August 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology raising serious concerns about the geotechnical safety analyses for the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The firm identified multiple flaws in the design work performed by the Port of Seattle's consultants, including underestimation of earthquake risk, incorrect seismic stability analyses, and overestimation of post-earthquake soil stability. GeoSyntec concluded that the Port's consultants had not adequately demonstrated that the embankment fill and retaining wall structures would perform safely under anticipated seismic loads over the facility's lifetime.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    EXH AR021830: GeoSyntec Letter — ACC Response to Comments, West MSE Wall Seismic Stability, Third Runway

    GeoSyntec Consultants, hired by the Airport Communities Coalition, wrote to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology in June 2001 raising serious technical concerns about the proposed Third Runway Expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter challenges the Port of Seattle's geotechnical analysis for the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, arguing that soil strength testing was insufficient, the extent of liquefiable material may have been underestimated, and seismic stability analyses were being performed incorrectly. GeoSyntec concluded that the Port had not yet demonstrated the wall could be safely and economically constructed to withstand potential seismic loads without unacceptable deformation.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, EIS, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR1255: FAA Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on Third Runway — New Technologies, MSE Wall, and Section 106 Activities

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region letter dated June 19, 2001, from FAA to Ms. Muffy Walker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Seattle District Office, following up on May 31, 2001 letter. Addresses three issues raised in April 30, 2001 Memorandum for the Record regarding the Port of Seattle third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-04-24

    EXH AR028160: Memorandum for Record — Corps Review of Draft Response to Comments from Azous and Sheldon on Third Runway

    Memorandum for Record (MFR) dated 24 April 2001 from CENWS-OD-RG summarizing telephone conversations with Elizabeth Leavitt and Jim Kelley (Port of Seattle consultants) on 9-10 April 2001 regarding the Army Corps of Engineers’ review of the Port’s draft responses to letters from Azous and Sheldon concerning the Third Runway project at Sea-Tac Airport. Corps comments
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Elizabeth Leavitt, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-26

    EXH AR049975: Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance and Photo Documentation — STIA Third Runway Project

    Memorandum from Michael Bailey, P.E., Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E., HNTB Corporation, dated March 26, 2001, documenting post-earthquake reconnaissance at the Sea-Tac Airport (STIA) Third Runway Project site (project J-4978-06) following the February 28, 2001, Nisqually earthquake. Two reconnaissance visits on March 1 and March 2, 2001 by Hart Crowser engineers Doug Lindquist
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-26

    EXH AR050017: MSE Wall Performance During Earthquake — Hart Crowser Memorandum to Port Of Seattle

    Hart Crowser memorandum (J-4978-19) from Michael Bailey, P.E., to Port Of Seattle attn. Michael J. Cheyne, CC HNTB attn. Jim Thomson, P.E., dated March 26, 2001, summarizing MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall performance during the February 28 Nisqually earthquake. Discusses two MSE walls identified by Helsell Fetterman (Eglick & Stock 3/20/01) and GeoSyntec (3/15/01) as
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Long wait times at Sea-Tac Airport 07/20/2023" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V