Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMechanically Stabilized Earth(42)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-15

    EXH 403: GeoSyntec Letter to Army Corps & WA Ecology — Nisqually Earthquake Implications STIA Third Runway MSE Wall & Embankment Fill

    Following the Nisqually earthquake of February 28, 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants wrote to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology raising serious concerns about the seismic safety of the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter highlighted that the earthquake caused damage to mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls and widespread liquefaction despite being only a moderate event, reinforcing earlier warnings about flaws in the project's seismic design criteria and ground motion analysis. GeoSyntec argued that the airport's role as a regional emergency lifeline demands higher safety standards than those applied to ordinary residential structures.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-05

    EXH AR049946: Revised Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum dated March 5, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist E.I.T., Barry Chen PhD P.E., and Michael Bailey P.E. of Hart Crowser Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. of HNTB, project J-4978-30. Presents revised methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the SeaTac Third Runway embankment, based on revised probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and one-dimensional site
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-26

    Exhibit 2061: Ecology Dam Safety Office — MSE Wall and Stormwater Pond Dam Safety Review, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Project

    Email chain (Exhibit 2061, AR031718-AR031720) dated February 26, 2001, from Jerald LaVassar (Ecology Dam Safety Office) to Ann Kenny (Ecology), responding to Andrea Grad (Helsell law firm, representing ACC/Airport Communities Coalition). LaVassar explains why the Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall at Sea-Tac Airport’s third runway project does not qualify as a dam under WAC 173-175-020,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH 401: GeoSyntec Letter — ACC Technical Comments Third Runway Embankment Fill, West MSE Wall, IWS Lagoon #3 Expansion

    In February 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a technical review letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raising serious concerns about the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter identified significant deficiencies in the geotechnical investigation, analysis, and design of the planned embankment fill and West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, warning that the project's foundations involved weak peat and liquefiable sands in a highly seismic area. GeoSyntec concluded that the available data was insufficient to confirm the safety of what would be the tallest MSE wall in the world, and that approval should not be granted without a more thorough geotechnical review.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-16

    Comments on Seattle Tacoma International Airport Project: Third Runway – Embankment Fill and West MSE Wall, and Industrial Wastewater System Lagoon #3 Expansion Project on Second Public Notice

    In February 2001, engineering firm GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a technical review letter on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raising serious concerns about the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review identified significant deficiencies in the geotechnical investigation and analysis supporting construction of the embankment fill and West MSE Wall, including insufficient soil strength data and inadequate seismic safety assessments. GeoSyntec warned that the proposed design — which would result in the world's tallest MSE wall built over weak, potentially unstable soils in a seismically active region — could fail under earthquake conditions, threatening both airport operations and nearby natural resources.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR018360: Sheldon & Associates Response to 2000 Public Notice Comments — Water Movement Through Fill and MSE Wall

    Sheldon & Associates letter dated February 15, 2001, responding to public notice comments regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Masterplan Update Projects Section 404/401 Permits. Addresses movement of water through embankment fill and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall, drainage layer design to prevent excess pore pressures, rock underdrain clogging prevention using Group 1A filter material, shallow
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-08

    Exhibit 2060: Ecology Response to PDA Requests on Dam Safety and MSE Wall Review, Plus Memorandum on Retaining Wall Alternatives for Miller Creek

    Email dated February 8, 2001 from Ann Kenny (Ecology Senior Environmental Specialist) to Andrea Grad, Peter Eglick, and Kevin Stock responding to PDA requests regarding Chapter 173-175 WAC Dam Safety review of Port Of Seattle Third Runway stormwater facilities. Covers ISW Lagoon #3, 25.5 acre-foot pond (SDW1A), 37.91 acre-foot pond (SDW1B), MSE wall Dam Safety
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-08

    EXH AR049869: Hart Crowser Letter — Comments on 404/401 Permit Applications for Port Of Seattle Third Runway MSE Retaining Walls

    Letter dated February 8, 2001 from Hart Crowser Principal Geotechnical Engineer to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny), documenting comments made at the January 26, 2001 public hearing on 404/401 permit applications J-4978-30-06. Comments focus on the design and independent technical review of mechanically stabilized earth
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-07

    Exhibit 2059: Email and Memorandum on Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Exhibit 2059 (AR 031711–031713, ECY00010776–10778). Email from Gus Ordonez to Ann Kenny dated February 7, 2001, transmitting a memorandum from Jerald LaVassar, M.S., P.E. to Tom Luster reviewing the report ‘Evaluation of Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Embankment Station 174+00 to 186+00’ for the Third Runway project at Sea-Tac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049866: Letter from Peter M. Douglass, Technical Review Board Facilitator, Regarding Third Runway Embankment Fill and MSE Wall Design Review

    Letter dated January 25, 2001 from Peter M. Douglass, P.E. (Technical Review Board Facilitator) to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman, Project Manager) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, Environmental Specialist) summarizing findings of an independent expert panel convened by Port Of Seattle to review embankment fill and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR023116: Rebuttal to Response to 401/404 Comments, Miller Creek Relocation Project, STIA Master Plan Update" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V