EXH AR021838: GeoSyntec Comments Third Runway Embankment Fill & West MSE Wall – ACC Technical Review Letter

In August 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology raising serious concerns about the geotechnical safety analyses for the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The firm identified multiple flaws in the design work performed by the Port of Seattle's consultants, including underestimation of earthquake risk, incorrect seismic stability analyses, and overestimation of post-earthquake soil stability. GeoSyntec concluded that the Port's consultants had not adequately demonstrated that the embankment fill and retaining wall structures would perform safely under anticipated seismic loads over the facility's lifetime.

Notes

GeoSyntec Consultants letter dated 6 August 2001, submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Regulatory Branch) and Washington State Department of Ecology on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), providing technical review comments on Hart Crowser geotechnical documents for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway embankment fill and West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall. Reviewed documents include Hart Crowser’s December 4, 2000 geotechnical engineering analyses, January 25, 2001 seismic design memorandum, and March 5, 2001 liquefaction analysis memorandum. GeoSyntec (Patrick C. Lucia, Ph.D., P.E. and Edward Kavazanjian, Jr., Ph.D., P.E.) identifies critical deficiencies: underestimated seismic risk from multiple Seattle-region earthquake sources, incorrect seismic stability and FLAC deformation analyses, improper representation of liquefiable material extent, overestimated composite shear strengths using one-third/two-thirds liquefaction assumption, progressive yielding mechanism ignored at embankment toe, and insufficient documentation for regulatory decision. Exhibit AR021838, PCHB Third Runway proceeding.

V V