• 1982-02-09 23:48

    Port of Seattle – Letter to Bill Bowlin re Sunset Activity Center Noise Density Guidelines

    In December , Port of Seattle and Federal Aviation Administrat representatives met with State Representative Janet Berleen, topic of conversation was the North Sea'--Tac Park, specific_all guidelines as recomnended in the North Sea-Tac Park Master Pl i& tbThe maIn y the density a A an e As you know, the concept of the North Sea-Tac Park included participation bY the Port , King County, and community, Because of budget restrictions , the King County Department of Parks and Recreation has been Involved to a lesser extent than originally envisioned, Your organization, the Greater Highline Ck)mmunity Parks Board , has taken over the leadership role of King County in park development but as a non-profit Organization without a taxing base such as the County has , the Parks Board faces problems of funding too, ++ The density guidelines contained in the Plan and lease between the Port ald Parks Board are parameters for development , The FAA, in a letter to $enator Slade Gorton , states that the I'participant ofiented t1 co®cept would' The gymnasium and meeting areas of the school building are subject to a of yo£lr non-profit status and operations , both the FAA and Port feel that special events may require special attention, The spirit and intent of the guidelines are to remain , if the Parks Board , however , feels Chat a special fund raising event which potentially wil:I. exceed the -anan.= present guidelines can benef iE the long-"-term development of the park, it should contact…
  • 1981-06-12 00:00

    Zone 3 – Letter to FAA Director re Noise Density Guidelines, June 12, 1981

    Zone 3, a citizen group of residents living adjacent to Sea Tac Airport (within the boundaries defined as f’noise remedy progra'n areas” in the Sea Tac Cornnunities Plantt would :Like you to know that-although we would have preferred to see fewer people 'lunder the flight pathl'- we do support the people per acre density gulde- lines for recreational planning of the North Sea Tac Park as re- commended by the FAA, It is difficult to narrow our concerns and reasonings down for the coapatible use of the lands north of Sea Tac , However, i think it most appropriate to use the enclosed items as most per- tin ent facts + 1, From the :DRAFT-E:iS-Sea Tac ComIn'ani ties :Plan 11)lore land under the flight path dedicated tO airport, Clear zones and OPen space use provides extra nargins of safety event of an aircraft mishap, besides lessening human exposure to noise pIt in tfl e , The crigina} Interim! :[,and Acquisition defined in the Memorandum to the Port of Se,att: e Corn:ni ssiori meeting date<:i 9/ 11/73 called !’ a =ortY,er:y =c quis!-tion from our present northern boundary , 146It}, St , , north to So . 14Ct,h St . and lying between Des Moines Way on the west and 24 th A'- e , So , on the east , Include i in tllib WOU-'Ld be approximately 239 acres , including 151 rosS.denses and t};e S=,131 Set JunIOr HIgh School, it --- tIOn closer study 9 it ap- I>eared that…
  • 1981-05-13 00:00

    224-78-R Motion King County Council (Boeing HQ Rezone)

    Proposal to move Boeing headquarters to west side of airport noise buffer property from Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1981-04-20 00:00

    Proposed Highline Area Rezone Public Hearing – Port of Seattle Testimony

    PROPOSED HIGHLINE AREA REZONE PUBLIC HEARING - April 20, 1981 Testimony - Port of Seattle .. am Oris Dunham, Director of Aviation, Sea-Tac International Airport. The Port of Seattle is the major property owner in the community affected by the proposed Highline area zoning. For the most part, the Port believes the proposed area. zoning reflects proper efforts to insure compatible land use of the property surrounding the Airport. However, one aspect of the Highline Area Zoning Panel's recommendation--the S-R zoning of an area north of the Airport--totally disre- gards the notion of compatible land use and, therefore, must be opposed. The Port also objects, as beyond the County's jurisdiction, to certain proposed zoning and a previously imposed rezone condition relating to Port-owned property on the west side of the Airport. 1. 35-Acre North-End Area: North Issues #15 and #23 (blue) South Issue #33(A) (yellow) North Issue #38 (yellow) 15-Acre North-End Area: South Issue #33B (blue) At the north end of the Airport there is a 35-acre area bounded by 24th Avenue South, South !46th Street, and South 142nd Street. Th~ Port owns approximately 9 acres in this area (plus a 120-foot buffer strip along 24th Avenue South and South 142nd Street) and the remainder of the 35 acres is in private ownership. Under the criteria established in the Sea-Tac/Communi- ties Plan, this area is .. within the highest noise-impact zone. The Port -1- D/5 -: 04/16/81 acquired its approximately 9 acres in 1976-1977 in order to convert the property…
  • 1981-01-27 00:00

    HCP North Issues #43, 36, 57, 81, 83 – Airport Open Use Zoning

    Zoning amendment document for Highline area properties regarding Airport Open Use designation. Details proposed changes from existing single-family and multi-family zoning classifications to AOU and RS7200 potential AOU, with specific amendments to Area Zoning pages 55, 57, 81, and 83.
  • 1981-01-14 00:00

    Port of Seattle – Response to Community Concerns re Sea-Tac Airport, January 14, 1981

    PO BOX 68727 / SEATrLE. WASHINGTON 98188January 14, 1981 Mr, - William C, Holstine 14820 - 24th Avenue So, Seattle, Washington 98168 Dear Bill: This letter is in response to our meeting of November 14 and the question-' nail:e that you circulated around your comunity soliciting comnents about Port of Seattle community relationships , I hope that some .of these rather abbreviated answers assist you in communicating our concern about the prob- lens raised to your community and that it will help identify ways in which we jointly can address some of these problems, Interim Land Acquisition began in 1975 and was to te a five---year program ending in 1980, Because of the rapid escalating housing prices, and a prQblem getting Federal funding , the acquisition program has taken longer than expected, We expect to have the property acquisition up to South 136th Street completed in 18 months, As you know, property is also being acquired south of the Airport, so you are seeing just half of our total effort near your neighborhood, The purchase guarantee and insulation programs recommended by the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan have been investigated inhouse at the Port of Seattle, We have also conducted an accoustica1 insulation test program on two houses south of the Airport+ However , no monies have been made avail– able for implementation of these programs, We are putting our highest priority on the acquisition of residential property in those areas most impacted by noise, flights at Sea--Tac , also is decreasing they…
  • 1980-10-22 00:00

    Letter from Oris Dunham Airport Open Use (AOU) Classification Status Update

    Letter from Port of Seattle Policy Advisory Committee Chairman Oris Dunham to Virginia Dana providing status update on the Airport Open Use (AOU) classification in King County Zoning Ordinance. The letter explains the AOU classification’s purpose for economic development near airports and community concerns that led to a recommendation for deletion from the Highline Area
  • 1980-10-21 00:00

    Conditional Use Permit Report and Decision – Glacier High School File No. 80-75-C

    3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be null and void unless the parking lot improvements are made within one year from the effective date of this action. ORDERED this 25th day of November, 1980. ' • ' ·~ l ' L ......____ '> ) !.. .._. - · Q ~ TRANSMITTED this 26th day of November, 1980, to the following parties of record: James C. Scott Dr. James E. Jennings Virginia Dana Lloyd A. Peterson Tamiko Brown Carol E. Liedke Code Enforcement Zoning & Subdivision Examiner Action of the Zoning Adjustor may be appealed in writing by any aggrieved party to the King County Zoning and Subdivision Examiner. Appeals, together with appeal arguments as required by King County Ordinance No. 4461, must be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this transmittal, and submitted to the Building and Land Development Division addressed as follows: IB: jf Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104
  • 1980-07-18 20:17

    King County Code Violation complaint response Highline Schools closures

    Official response letter from King County Department of Planning and Community Development to Virginia E. Dana regarding her complaint on Motion 80-75-C, assigned case numbers 80-547 and 80-549. The letter outlines the complaint processing procedure including property ownership research, owner notification, and follow-up actions to ensure code compliance. Glendale Junior High 1201 S 104th St,