TagEPA(118)
-
1993-04-01
Estimation and Evaluation of Cancer Risks Attributed to Air Pollution in Southwest Chicago: Final Summary Report
Final Summary Report submitted to U.S. EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division by ViGYAN Inc., April 1993, estimating and evaluating cancer risks attributed to air pollution in southwest Chicago. The report assesses cancer risk from air pollutants in the southwest Chicago area, prepared under EPA contract for regional air quality and public health assessment. -
1993-04-01
Estimation and Evaluation of Cancer Risks Attributed to Air Pollution in Southwest Chicago: Final Summary Report
Final Summary Report submitted to U.S. EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division by ViGYAN Inc., April 1993, estimating and evaluating cancer risks attributed to air pollution in southwest Chicago. The report assesses cancer risk from air pollutants in the southwest Chicago area, prepared under EPA contract for regional air quality and public health assessment. -
1990-03-16
Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL): The Descriptor of Choice for Airport Noise Assessment
This 1990 FAA document explains why the Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL) was chosen as the standard metric for measuring airport noise. DNL averages noise exposure over a full 24-hour period, applying a penalty for nighttime flights, and has been adopted by multiple federal agencies—including the EPA, DOT, HUD, and DOD—as the most reliable way to assess how aircraft noise affects surrounding communities. The FAA formally incorporated DNL into federal regulation through FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, in 1981. -
1990-03-16
Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL): The Descriptor of Choice for Airport Noise Assessment
FAA Office of Environment and Energy report dated March 16, 1990 explaining the adoption of DNL (Day Night Average Sound Level) as the standard aircraft noise descriptor under FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. Covers EPA’s 1976 formal recommendation of DNL, the Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (1980), ANSI S3.23-1980, the Aviation Safety -
1984-10-01
EXH AR037232: Guidelines for Deriving Numerical Aquatic Site-Specific Water Quality Criteria by Modifying National Criteria
EPA-600/3-84-099, published October 1984 by the U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, Minnesota. Authored by Anthony R. Carlson, William A. Brungs, Gary A. Chapman, and David J. Hansen from EPA Environmental Research Laboratories in Duluth MN, Narragansett RI, Corvallis OR, and Gulf Breeze FL. Provides protocols for deriving numerical aquatic site-specific water quality criteria by -
1984-01-01
EXH AR037276: Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Copper – 1984
EPA document EPA 440/5-84-031 establishing ambient water quality criteria for copper, published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington D.C., pursuant to Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217). Authored by Robert W. Andrew (freshwater) and John H. Gentile (saltwater) at Environmental Research Laboratories in -
1973-07-27
Public health and welfare criteria for noise
This 1973 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency document establishes scientific criteria for understanding how noise affects public health and welfare, including hearing damage, annoyance, communication interference, and property value loss. Prepared by EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control under the Noise Control Act of 1972, it describes cause-and-effect relationships between noise exposure and human health impacts. The criteria laid out in this document were intended to serve as a foundation for developing future noise standards and regulations, though the document itself does not constitute a standard or regulation. -
U.S. Maps Airport‐Noise Curb; Pilots and Industry Assail Plan
WASHINGTON, June 21 —Sweeping recommendations designed to quiet the din of jet aircraft at airports around the country were made public to day by an Environmental Protection Agency study group. The proposals were quickly as sailed in statements by pilots and airport and airline executives as potentially unworkable and, in some cases, unsafe. The recommendations