Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEPA(118)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1993-04-01

    Estimation and Evaluation of Cancer Risks Attributed to Air Pollution in Southwest Chicago: Final Summary Report

    Final Summary Report submitted to U.S. EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division by ViGYAN Inc., April 1993, estimating and evaluating cancer risks attributed to air pollution in southwest Chicago. The report assesses cancer risk from air pollutants in the southwest Chicago area, prepared under EPA contract for regional air quality and public health assessment.
    TagsChicago Tribune, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Health, StudiesStudy TopicsAir Quality
  • 94000duz pdf
    1993-04-01

    Estimation and Evaluation of Cancer Risks Attributed to Air Pollution in Southwest Chicago: Final Summary Report

    Final Summary Report submitted to U.S. EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division by ViGYAN Inc., April 1993, estimating and evaluating cancer risks attributed to air pollution in southwest Chicago. The report assesses cancer risk from air pollutants in the southwest Chicago area, prepared under EPA contract for regional air quality and public health assessment.
    TagsChicago Tribune, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Health
  • 1990-03-16

    Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL): The Descriptor of Choice for Airport Noise Assessment

    This 1990 FAA document explains why the Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL) was chosen as the standard metric for measuring airport noise. DNL averages noise exposure over a full 24-hour period, applying a penalty for nighttime flights, and has been adopted by multiple federal agencies—including the EPA, DOT, HUD, and DOD—as the most reliable way to assess how aircraft noise affects surrounding communities. The FAA formally incorporated DNL into federal regulation through FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, in 1981.
    TagsDNL65, EPA, FAA, Noise, Part 150
  • FAA dnl65 the descriptor of choice for airport noise assessment 1990 pdf
    1990-03-16

    Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL): The Descriptor of Choice for Airport Noise Assessment

    FAA Office of Environment and Energy report dated March 16, 1990 explaining the adoption of DNL (Day Night Average Sound Level) as the standard aircraft noise descriptor under FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. Covers EPA’s 1976 formal recommendation of DNL, the Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (1980), ANSI S3.23-1980, the Aviation Safety
    TagsDNL65, EPA, FAA, Noise, Part 150
  • 1984-10-01

    EXH AR037232: Guidelines for Deriving Numerical Aquatic Site-Specific Water Quality Criteria by Modifying National Criteria

    EPA-600/3-84-099, published October 1984 by the U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, Minnesota. Authored by Anthony R. Carlson, William A. Brungs, Gary A. Chapman, and David J. Hansen from EPA Environmental Research Laboratories in Duluth MN, Narragansett RI, Corvallis OR, and Gulf Breeze FL. Provides protocols for deriving numerical aquatic site-specific water quality criteria by
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 1984-01-01

    EXH AR037276: Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Copper – 1984

    EPA document EPA 440/5-84-031 establishing ambient water quality criteria for copper, published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington D.C., pursuant to Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217). Authored by Robert W. Andrew (freshwater) and John H. Gentile (saltwater) at Environmental Research Laboratories in
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 1973-07-27

    Public health and welfare criteria for noise

    This 1973 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency document establishes scientific criteria for understanding how noise affects public health and welfare, including hearing damage, annoyance, communication interference, and property value loss. Prepared by EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control under the Noise Control Act of 1972, it describes cause-and-effect relationships between noise exposure and human health impacts. The criteria laid out in this document were intended to serve as a foundation for developing future noise standards and regulations, though the document itself does not constitute a standard or regulation.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, EPA, FAA, Noise
  • U.S. Maps Airport‐Noise Curb; Pilots and Industry Assail Plan

    WASHINGTON, June 21 —Sweeping recommendations designed to quiet the din of jet aircraft at airports around the country were made public to day by an Environmental Protection Agency study group. The proposals were quickly as sailed in statements by pilots and airport and airline executives as potentially unworkable and, in some cases, unsafe. The recommendations
    CategoriesLegislation TagsAirline Pilots Association, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, New York Times, Noise Control Act of 1972

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 10 Page 11 Page 12
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR017822: Ecology Draft Memorandum — Briefing Decision on Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Third Runway 401 Water Quality Certification" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V