Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(246)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-10-27

    EXH AR023816: STIA Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations Final Draft Meeting Notes Oct 27 2000

    These are meeting notes from a October 27, 2000 negotiation session between the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology regarding the 401 Water Quality Permit for Sea-Tac Airport's Third Runway project. The meeting covered technical issues including stormwater management planning, base flow impacts, and the Tyee Pond buffer, with participants tracking the resolution status of dozens of environmental compliance items. A jointly maintained master list of issues was used to document which technical concerns had been resolved, were pending additional information, or required further discussion before the permit could be issued.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-26

    Exhibit 89: FW: 3rd Runway Notes and Next Meetings — Ecology Internal Comments on 401 Certification Issues

    Exhibit 89 (AR 017784-017785). Email chain forwarded by Raymond Hellwig (Ecology) to Ann Kenny on October 26, 2000, containing internal comments by Tom Luster (Ecology) on draft 10/20/2000 meeting notes for the Sea-Tac Airport third runway 401/404 review. Luster raises concerns about: NPDES major modification and stormwater plan for SR-509 interchange; South Access/Tyee Pond spill
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR034564: Ecology Federal Permits Team Workload Items Memo from Tom L. to Paula

    Memo dated October 25, 2000 from Tom L. to Paula at Washington State Department of Ecology listing initial workload items for the next year. Items include updating Nationwide Permits with Army Corps of Engineers, developing Regional General Permits, investigating 401/CZM rule pros/cons, preparing for legislative session, coordinating on ESA issues, updating the 401/CZM Desk Manual,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Ecology, ESA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR046081: Port Of Seattle Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — CWA Section 404 Permit Application (JARPA) for STIA Master Plan Update Projects

    Letter dated October 25, 2000 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs, Port of Seattle, to Jonathan Freedman, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, submitting a new Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) for Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, Corps of Engineers Project No. 96-4-02325, for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR023741: Draft Memo — Transition 401 Review STIA

    A October 25, 2000 internal memo from Tom Luster to Ann Kenny outlines the transition of the 401 water quality certification review for the Sea-Tac Airport expansion project. It covers key outstanding issues including flow augmentation, water quality BMPs, and Clean Air Act compliance, as well as coordination needs with the Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, and WDFW. The memo also addresses document management, public disclosure requests, and contract administration changes related to the King County Stormwater Review.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-24

    EXH AR023664: Internal Email Chain — 3rd Runway 401/404 Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation, Tyee Pond, SASA, Agreed Order

    In October 2000, Washington State Department of Ecology staff exchanged internal emails debating conditions for issuing a Section 401 water quality certification related to Sea-Tac Airport's proposed third runway expansion. Key concerns included the need for approved stormwater plans for the Highway 509 interchange, potential impacts to Tyee Pond and Des Moines Creek flows from construction fill and impervious surfaces, and ensuring compliance with an existing Agreed Order governing groundwater contamination. Staff member Tom Luster warned that draft meeting notes did not accurately reflect prior internal agreements, and that issuing a 401 without addressing these issues could fail to meet regulatory requirements.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SASA, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-24

    Exhibit 2107: Memorandum — Refocusing Work Priorities for Tom Luster

    Memorandum dated October 24, 2000 from Paula Ehlers, Section Manager, to Gordon White, Jeannie Summerhays, Ray Heilwig, and Seatac File, regarding refocusing work priorities for Tom Luster, Senior Policy Lead for federal permitting. Ehlers explains that Tom Luster’s involvement in the SeaTac Third Runway project has prevented him from fulfilling his statewide Section 401 Clean
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-23

    EXH AR018385: Internal Email from Tom Luster re 3rd Runway 401/404 Review Issues — NPDES, Des Moines Creek, Lagoon #3, Tyee Pond

    Internal email chain dated October 23, 2000 from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Joan Marchioro (ATG), forwarded November 20, 2000 to Thomas Fitzsimmons, concerning 401/404 review of SeaTac airport Third Runway expansion. Luster raises unresolved issues including: NPDES major modification and stormwater plan approval for SR-509 interchange as prerequisite
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2000-10-18

    Exhibit 87: Email from Tom Luster to Raymond Hellwig et al. Regarding Sea-Tac 401 Certification Issues

    Email dated October 18, 2000 from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Paula Ehlers, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Joan Marchioro (ATG) regarding Sea-Tac Airport Section 401 water quality certification requirements. Luster notes his minority opinion on what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet 401 requirements, and provides drafty notes from a prior
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-10-18

    EXH AR023911: Email Luster to Ecology Staff – STIA 401 Certification Requirements & Minority Opinion

    In an October 18, 2000 email, Tom Luster of Washington State Department of Ecology shares his draft notes from a discussion about what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet Section 401 water quality certification requirements related to Sea-Tac Airport. Luster acknowledges that his views represent a minority opinion within the group, but argues his written notes may be clearer than his verbal explanations and could help prepare the agency to respond to similar questions likely to arise during public review. He expresses hope that sharing these notes will help the team reach a legally defensible decision on the 401 certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR021110: Analytical Resources Inc. Cover Letter & Glycols Analysis Data, CASE Project EB44" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V