Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAviation Fuel(72)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2026-04-07

    Delta joins the growing list of US airlines raising checked bag fees as jet fuel costs soar

    By RIO YAMAT, AP Airlines and Travel Writer Delta Air Lines announced Tuesday that it is raising checked baggage fees, part of a broader wave of U.S. carriers responding to higher jet fuel prices tied to the war in the Middle East. Beginning Wednesday, most domestic and short-haul international passengers will pay $45 to check
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAirline Industry, Aviation Fuel
  • 2026-03-27

    How Seattle flight prices from Sea-Tac Airport may be impacted by war

    By Angela Lim Seattle Times features reporter The cost of jet fuel in the United States has ballooned due to the U.S.-Israel war with Iran and a resultant oil crisis. And though airfare prices have not skyrocketed yet for Seattle travelers, experts say airlines will soon be forced to raise prices to offset fuel costs.
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAviation Fuel, Sea-Tac Airport, Seattle Times
  • 2026-03-19

    Email from Ann Richart to Megan Cotton Regarding Washington State Aviation Fuel Tax Compliance and Missed FAA Deadline

    In March 2026, Washington State aviation and transportation officials exchanged emails revealing that the state faces approximately $210 million in aviation fuel tax liability after an FAA audit found it had been improperly diverting aviation fuel tax revenues to non-compliant uses. Even if all disputed expenditures—totaling about $32.6 million—were proven allowable, Washington would still be found in non-compliance, prompting the state's Aviation Director to recommend a proactive resolution strategy with the FAA. The correspondence also references federal law allowing state aviation fuel taxes to fund 'state aviation programs,' with ongoing debate about whether uses such as Sustainable Aviation Fuel development could qualify as compliant under that definition.
    Tags2026 legislative session, Audit, Aviation Fuel, FAA, WSDOTFolderAviation
  • Richart to cotton email 2026 03 19 pdf
    2026-03-19

    Email from Ann Richart to Megan Cotton Regarding Washington State Aviation Fuel Tax Compliance and Missed FAA Deadline

    In March 2026, Washington State aviation and transportation officials exchanged emails revealing that the state faces approximately $210 million in aviation fuel tax liability after an FAA audit found it had been improperly diverting aviation fuel tax revenues to non-compliant uses. Even if all disputed expenditures—totaling about $32.6 million—were proven allowable, Washington would still be found in non-compliance, prompting the state's Aviation Director to recommend a proactive resolution strategy with the FAA. The correspondence also references federal law allowing state aviation fuel taxes to fund 'state aviation programs,' with ongoing debate about whether uses such as Sustainable Aviation Fuel development could qualify as compliant under that definition.
    Tags2026 legislative session, Audit, Aviation Fuel, FAA, WSDOTFolderAviation
  • 2026-03-18

    FAA Compliance Correspondence: WSDOT Aviation Fuel Tax Federal Revenue Use Requirements — Missed 2/18/26 Deadline

    This document is an email chain from March 2026 between Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the Governor's Office, and the FAA regarding Washington State's compliance with federal aviation fuel tax requirements. WSDOT missed a February 18, 2026 deadline to provide information requested by the FAA, and the FAA subsequently issued a demand warning that compliance and enforcement actions would follow if the information was not received within 10 days. WSDOT officials indicated they do not have the ability to provide the requested information and sought guidance from the Governor's Office and the Office of Financial Management.
    TagsAviation Fuel, Department of Revenue, FAA, public records request, State of Washington, WSDOTFolderAviation
  • 2026-03-17

    P020444-042926 – FAA Review of Washington State Aviation Fuel Tax Compliance: Email Correspondence

    These emails document a 2025–2026 federal compliance matter in which the FAA reviewed Washington State's aviation fuel tax practices to determine whether they met federal revenue-use requirements. After Washington missed a February 18, 2026 response deadline, the FAA notified state officials at the Department of Revenue and WSDOT, prompting coordination between multiple state agencies. While related to aviation finance rather than airport noise policy directly, the correspondence reflects ongoing federal oversight of Washington State's aviation funding obligations.
    TagsAviation Fuel, Department of Revenue, FAA, public records request, State of Washington, WSDOTFolderAviation
  • 020226 airport mt getty cm 01
    2026-03-08

    Feds ramp up scrutiny in years long dispute over California airport money

    In summary The FAA wants California to prove it’s allocating jet fuel tax revenue to aviation. Hundreds of millions of dollars are at stake. Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAviation Fuel, CalMatters, FAA
  • 041020 lax airport ground crew ap cm
    2026-03-03

    Jet fuel subsidies must ensure accountability for Californians affected by airplane pollution

    Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering statewide issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WeeklyMatters for a Saturday morning digest of the latest news and commentary from the Golden State. This story is part of California Voices, a commentary forum aiming to broaden our understanding of the state and spotlight Californians directly impacted
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAviation Fuel, CalMatters
  • 2026-02-09

    SB 5898 – S COMM AMD by Committee on Ways & Means

    Washington Senate Bill 5898 proposes redirecting a portion of the state's hazardous substance tax on aircraft fuel to fund noise relief for communities near airports. Specifically, 25 percent of those tax proceeds would go into a new "state aircraft noise mitigation account," with the remaining 75 percent continuing to flow to the aeronautics account as before. The Department of Commerce would administer a grant program using these funds to support noise mitigation strategies in communities located within designated aviation impact areas, with the law taking effect July 1, 2027.
    TagsAviation Fuel, Department Of Commerce, Noise Mitigation, SB5898, Washington State LegislatureFolderLegislation
  • WA Capitol Winter2026 Web
    2026-02-09

    Senate Ways & Means Committee Exec Session – SB 5898

    Would bring WA State Aviation Fuel Tax into FAA compliance. This may open amendments to funding for noise mitigation. Maybe. It will take money from various pollution control funds (not airport). Watch meeting here: https://tvw.org/video/senate-ways-means-2026021217/?eventID=2026021217 https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5898&Year=2025&Initiative=False
    CategoriesEvents TagsAOPA, Aviation Fuel, SB5898, WSDOT

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 … Page 8
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PCHB Doc 5050: Port Of Seattle Motion to Dismiss ACC and CASE Petition for Review of Agency Action" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V