Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-06-03

    EXH AR001008: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions

    Port Of Seattle response filed in PCHB case No. 01-160 opposing ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion motion for correction, clarification, and reconsideration of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s prior order publishing deposition portions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses (Erik Stockdale, Hellwig, Tom Luster). Port argues motion is untimely
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-31

    EXH AR001007: CASE’s Concurrence in ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions

    PCHB No. 01-160. Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), represented by Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney P.L.L.C. (WSBA #27782), concurs with and joins Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Correction, Clarification, and Reconsideration of the Order Publishing Depositions, filed May 31, 2002, received by Environmental Hearings Office June 4, 2002. Respondents are Washington State
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-31

    PCHB Doc 1013: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions

    Respondent State of Washington Department of Ecology concurs with and joins Port Of Seattle’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions, PCHB No. 01-160. Filed May 31, 2002, signed by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro, Jeff B. Kray, and
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-30

    PCHB Doc 1014: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order proposed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Document received May 30, 2002 by the Environmental Hearings Office. Submitted by Helsell
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 28: ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification, and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of the Order Publishing Certain Portions of Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses. Motion identifies three categories of discrepancies: (1)
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law — Ecology and Port Of Seattle v. ACC and CASE

    Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle in PCHB Case No. 01-160, received May 22, 2002. Document addresses appeal by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) of the §401 Clean Water Act Certification (33 U.S.C. §1341) issued by Ecology
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, hearing held March 18-29, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appellant and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) intervenor versus Washington State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle respondents. Document presents proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order regarding Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Document addresses Section 401 water quality certification for Sea-Tac Airport third runway project, covering stormwater,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-15

    EXH 347: ACC Second Supplemental Response to RFP No. 2 — Expert Witness Docs

    This document is a legal filing from the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) submitted to Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board in a case against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It lists technical documents and studies relied upon by ACC's expert witnesses, covering topics such as retaining wall and slope alternatives affecting Miller Creek, seismic analysis of reinforced soil walls, and stormwater runoff management near Sea-Tac Airport. The referenced materials include engineering evaluations, water quality research, and stormwater best management practice guidelines relevant to the airport's expansion impacts.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-13

    IDX 054811: Index & Exhibits — ACC/CASE vs. Ecology/Port, PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 18–29, 2002

    This document contains the transcript of proceedings from a March 2002 hearing before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing, held in Lacey, Washington from March 18–29, 2002, included opening statements, board rulings, and witness testimony from multiple parties. The transcript was prepared by certified court reporters Gene Barker & Associates and filed with the Environmental Hearings Office in May 2002.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Transcript

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "A Letter To Nancy Tosta Re. RCW 53.54.030" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V