TagRv(3131)

E x h i b i t s - Corm Mtg - 6-12-79 WU MOD SEA 95211 WU003 EA032(0819l(4-OO4708N163-O@1)PD 06/12/79 0651 C s IP tVRUC PTL SUSPECTED OUPLICATE 4-007106E163 PRB 048 I C s IPMMTZZ CSP 2122ri~0800 TDMT NEW KIRK NY 7 06-12 0 6 5 1 ~ EST PMS PORT OF SEATTLE, TLX 328058 ATTH DICK FORD. BEFORE 2PM TERMINAL 66 SEATTLE WA ET VOTE III FAVOR OF RESOLUiIOH 2761 PAUL S FRIEDLANDER PORT COMhIISSIONER 1111l111 WU MOO SEA HU fl00 SEA 950A W O O 3 032~00191~4-004748N163-0011P0 06/12/79 0651 ICs IPElPRUC PTL SUSPECTED DUPLICATE‘ 4-007106E163 PRB 048 ICs IPMMTZZ CSP 2122@@0@00 T O N NEW YORK N Y 7 06-12 0 6 5 l A EST PMS PORT OF SEATTLE, TLX 328058 A T W OICK FORO, BEFORE 2PN TERMIML 66 SEATTLE WA BT VOTE I N FAVOR OF RESOLUTION 2761

THE FIVE YEAR C~PitAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR THE HIGHL..;INE AREA .. ·' ' " :: :;~ ·-. .•- -....:..." ~ .. ~:~;,.( · ..;:. .· .. " ~ ; ·~ Finance Committee King County E nvironmentol Development Commission f " .. ' j ) 1 ... $T . ' "' Join us in discussing this r e port Wed n e s ~a y February 13 7: 0 0 p.m. , at H i g hI i n e High School cafetorium 225 South 152nd, Burien .. , • KING COUNTY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM As it relates to the Highline Area INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared as part of an Environmental Development Commission and King County Government program to provide the public with coordinated information on the improve- ment projects tentatively scheduled for acquisition and/or construction from 1974 through 1979. It is our intent that this information will give the public an opportunity to express their viewpoints on tentative develop- ment projects before the County has made definite financial and legislative commitments. The Environmental Development Commission (E.D.C.) is a 134 member citizens advisory group which consists of an 18 member commission and 9 functional committees. The Capital Finance Committee is charged with providing citizen input for the County's Capital Improvement Program Planning. The public meeting in your community is one means of providing a forum for public discussion of planned projects. As a vehicle of citizen participation, this approach brings a wide range of alternatives into the planning process…

The STCP is the PLAN adopted by the Port of Seattle and King County. The major th1~st of that PLAN addresses the airport and its noise impacted areas. The Policy Advisory Committee is the group that monitors the PLAN. It is critical that the Port of Seattle and King County understand the needs of those most affected by the PLAN - therefore I would urge that the citizen representatives in that committee come from the noise impacted areas. Sincerely, &J~~~~-tv-JL John Jovanovich State Representative 31st District cc: Virginia Davis JJ:lm FOaTY -S1XTI1 LEG1SlA TURE 1979-10 l.J

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, to encourage, develop, and attain Oct. 24, 1978 an air transportation system which relies on competitive market forces to [S. 2493] determine the quality, variety, and price of air services, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assemhled, Airline SHORT TITLE Deregulation Act of 1978. SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the "Airline Deregulation Act 49 USC 1301 of 1978". note. DEFINITIONS SEC. 2. (a) Section 101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1301) is amended— (1) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new paragraphs: "(14) 'Charter air carrier' means an air carrier holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to engage in charter air transportation, "(15) 'Charter air transportation' means charter trips, including inclusive tour charter trips, in air transportation, rendered pursuant to authority conferred under this Act under regulations prescribed by the Board."; (2) by inserting after paragraph (32) the following new paragraph: " (33) 'Predatory' means any practice which would constitute a viola- tion of the antitrust laws as set forth in the first section of the Clayton Act (15U.S.C. 12)."; (3) by inserting after paragraph (35) the following new para- graph : "(36) 'State agency' means that department, agency, officer, or other entity of a State government which has been designated accord- ing to State law as— "(A) the recipient of any notice required…

1. Long-t e: r m won i torin r, .:-mel overv iew of Se a-Tac Plan impl c::-.c.1t,nt:i ·cn :.:. __ ,,. '.: 2. Deal with speci al i ss~ c s aDd proLlemG 3. PAC mske s recom.TTien da. t i ons to Kin g Coun ::y Executive · and t he Council, Execat ::.vc Director and the Port o f Sea ttle Corr.mi ss ion 4. PAC should he able to initiate ac tior.s/recom;:;endations r ~;- : ca pi tal pro gr aF:S Composil i.o;; of the Fol i c •,.; lldvi.su r·: Comr;;itte e Repre s 0ntativ0 fro~ K~ng Cou~ ty Representativ e selected by Board o f P.J .C. Rep resent a tive s f r o!" the Po1:: of Se at tle (Av j,ation a n d Flan~ing a~J Research Departmen ts) Rep re s ~ nt a t ive f ran loca l bus jn e s~ * - ------· .. - ---· ~- 978 ~ -: - ----- --- ~ ;.---·· --·- ~-------~--:-- ~---- (rep r es~nting Buri e.:;t Cha:::-,:--er of Con:Dt. rc .-:; , De s Hoine f: C o f C an d "th(;. s L.r i.~ " ) ~should live i n area and s hould be selected by a . gra up cee ting Repre sen t ai: ive from the P.i;h line School Distr ic t Represen t a t ive fr o:-:1 loc a.l goYe rnrr,c nt * (rcpreser.ting De s !·k·ine s, Tuh.'i l a ,…

al proposal to reorganize or restructure the contra versial Port of Seattle Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) was bypassed last week as members decided to continue quarterly sessions for another year. PAC, born in 1973 to put together the Sea-Tac Communities Plan, was reorganized about 18 months ago as a continuing body that would oversee carrying out the plan. The group is made up of representatives from the airport, the airlines, the Federal Aviation Admin- istration, King County, the Highline School District, businesses, cities and the neighborh(xxi. Thi latter has been a stickler. The idea was to have four community representatives selected by the Highline Community Council to represent the' com' munities east, west, south and north. But some airport-area residents have complained they weren’t represented on the committee. Calling themselves the “Zone 3 Committee” (their neighbor- h(xxi is in an area designated that by F.A.A.-mandat- ed noise standards surrounding the airport), last Jan- uary they convinced the Policy Advisory Committee to add a community member from their group. But even that didn’t satisfy them. “We’re the people most affected by the airport,” Jean Pihlman, a Zone 3 member, has said at meeting after meeting. “But we have the least say. We aren’t fairly represented on PAC. and we must be.” As a group, PAC has had little time to “oversee implementation of the Sea-Tac plan,” as its mandate nquires. Instead, its nreetings have repeatedly disin' tegrated into heated discussions with Zone 3 mem- tnrs and with other special-interest groups. The…

a new zone consistent with the Sea-Tac Communities Plan open space policies; adding a new chapter to Title 21; and adding a definition to Chapter 21.04 K.C.C. SECTION 1. Purpose. The principal purpose to be served by the Airport Open Use (AOU) classification and its application is to permit economic uses and development of areas affected by major airports which are compatible with neighboring residential areas, designated open space areas, and airport clear zone requirements. SECTION 2. Permitted Uses. In the AOU zone the folloHing uses are permitted as hereinafter specifically provided and allowed by this chapter, subject to the off-street parking requirements and the general provisions and exceptions set forth in this title beginning with Chapter 21.46. (1) Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to any of the uses permitted or conditionally permitted in this chapter, except dwelling units, when located on the same site as the principal use. (2) Signs, provided that: (a) No free-standing sign shall exceed fifty square feet per face, not to exceed two faces per sign. (b) Any sign shall be used exclusively to advertise a business conducted, services rendered, goods produced or sold upon the premisP.s, or any other lawful activity conducted upon such premises, or to identify permitted uses; (c) One sign per permitted use shall be allowed when n mounted flush with a permitted building, not above the roof line~ Such signs shall not exceed fifty sq~are fe~t. {d) Any lighted sign shall be stationary and nonflashing. Lights shall be directed…

A. Sea-Tac Communities Plan initiates this kind of effort. (3) B. Very positive action must be taken to assure continuance of a Sea-Tac Communities Plan format after the study is completed. (3) c. (9) 2. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE ON ALL PORT ACTIVI- TIES, INCLUDING AIRPORT OPERATIONS AND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT. (35) A. Somewhat in effect at present, but no formalized action has been taken by the Port in the past. Work directly with the community. A new Director of Community Affairs has been named. This question also relates to capital improvement schedules. (3) B. The continued improvements in this area are desirable. (3) c. (9) 3. THE IMMEDIATE COMMUNITIES SHOULD BE KEPT BRIEFED AND BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT AT THE AIRPORT. (36) A. Public input to the planning process is essential for com- patible development. EIS also requires public input prior to project acceptance. This is technically feasible, and is in effect now in relation to the Sea-Tac Communities Plan. (3) B. (3) c. (9) 4. THERE SHOULD BE MORE COMMUNITY USE OF THE TERMINAL AREAS. (34) A. Traffic access and limited facilities could pose problems, but services such as restaurants, lounges and shops would welcome additional business. Relates to more community use. This is an objective of the study. (3) B. This was generally viewed as desirable. (3) c. (9) / ... / 5. A RE-STRUCTURING OF TAX ALLOCATIONS SHOULD BE EXAMINED, SO SOME OF THE LEASEHOLD TAX WOULD GO TO THE LOCAL SCHOOL…

AN ORDINANCE adopting the Sea-Tac Conununi tie~ PJab; !·as an addendum to the King County Comprehens;ive I i Plan for the future growth, development and rede- 1 ' ,,,velopment of· Sea-Tac International Airport apd ~he1 surrounding communi ties, , I ! S'FAT~MENT OF' FACTS: . I i 1. The King County Council passed Motion 1019 on NoVi ember 27, ~972, authorizing King County to apply for Federa:l 1 ' . Aviation Administration Planning ·Grant Funds with th~ . Por.t :.of Seattle to conduct ·master pl.nnirtg :for Se~~T~c 1 • ·International Airport and the _surrounding vicinity .. J i 2.. 'fhe application was approved by the Federal A:Viatti):n Administration for a sum of $641,468 on January 28, ~973'_,, .. • I I' "· ' ', I I • I '! i '. 3. The contracted and in- kind portions of that gran'tl ~ave been! satisfactorily accomplisbed. . j !'' ! 4. Community involvement was a: thorough ·and conttnu~·ng! · elf:'ment of the Sea-Tac Communi~ies Plan as certif'ied jby the ~ing. County Policy Development Commission and: doeu·h ment~d in their report "Report ·on Community Invol;vemdnt: in the sea-Tac C~unities Planning Process.!' ! I ! ' . . I' • I 5. King· County has considerable land use controlj in the . :i~~~~~~;lned as_ the vicinity of ~e~-Tac Internatilonalll i i , I 6. ~n Environmental Impact· Statement has· been pr'epaljed: which examines the effects of the Sea-Tac Communilties ! ' Plani · .. I 1 . . • I : .7. The…

Document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Office of Environmental Quality Washington, D.C. 20591 Technical ~eport Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. FAA-EQ-76~6 4. Title ond Subtitle FAA Integrated Noise Model Data Base 7. All.thorls) ~eter A. Mansbach 9. Performing Organization Name and Address THE MITRE CORPORATION/METREK DIVISION 1820 DOLLEY MADISON BOULEVARD MCLEAN, VIRGINIA 22101 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 'WA~HTNGTON. D,C 20591 3. Recipient's Cotolog No. 5. Report Dote August 1976 6. Performing Orgoni zoti on Code W-47 8. Performing Organization Report No. MTR-7289 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. DOT-FA69NS-162 13. Type of Report ond Period Covered 14. Sponsoring Agency Code DOT/FAA 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstroct The FAA Integrated Noise Model computer program INMPROG has been made available to the public for computing a variety of noise indices in the vicinity of airports. One component of this program package is a data library which provides both acoustic and operational data for certain standard aircraft types and flight procedures. This paper presents the data used to construct the supplied program library. It thus provides the information needed to reproduce a particular analysis. Further, it provides a necessary reference point for the user who specifies his own operational procedures. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Document is available to the public through the National…