Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-14

    EXH AR021854: Helsell Fetterman to Army Corps Transmitting GeoSyntec Comments on Hart Crowser Geotechnical Summary RP, Third Runway Embankment Fill and West MSE Wall, STIA

    A January 2002 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises concerns with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers about the Port of Seattle's revised construction plans for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. The Port switched from an in-place ground improvement approach to excavating up to three million cubic yards of material beneath the proposed retaining wall, a major change that critics argue could significantly harm Miller Creek and adjacent wetlands. Attached technical comments from GeoSyntec Consultants also identify deficiencies in the Port's geotechnical report and argue the changes undermine the Port's Clean Water Act Section 404 permit application.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 005454: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Compel Depositions and for Limitation on Entry onto Land

    Port Of Seattle motion filed January 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Port Of Seattle moves to compel ACC to make designated witnesses available for deposition per the Board’s Prehearing Order of October 30, 2001, and to impose CR 34(b)
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 5063: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right

    Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for summary judgment in PCHB No. 01-160, filed January 14, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Ecology argues that a water right is not required for reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be met under Clean Water Act § 401 Certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005302: ACC’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule — PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion filed in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, seeking to extend the discovery schedule against Port Of Seattle and Department of Ecology. ACC requests extension of Port Of Seattle witness deposition deadline from February 1, 2002 to February 25, 2002; final
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    PCHB Doc 005309: ACC’s Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to compel entry upon the Third Runway/Master Plan Update project area filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against Department of Ecology et al. ACC seeks an order for access to observe, photograph, and sample soils, wetlands, and streams in the project area. Motion details Port Of
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR053235: Geotechnical Input to MSE Wall Design, Third Runway Embankment

    Memorandum dated January 11, 2002, from Michael Bailey P.E. and Barry Chen P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. of HNTB Corporation, regarding geotechnical design parameters for Third Runway MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall design at Sea-Tac Airport. Document AR 053235-053237 covers minimum factors of safety for static and seismic stability per 1996-2000
    TagsACC, FAA, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 22
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005316: Declaration of Michael P. Witek in Support of ACC’s Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property and to Extend Discovery Schedule

    Declaration by Michael P. Witek filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) supporting ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle property and to extend discovery schedule. Document relates to Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Compel Inspection of Port Property

    Proposed order in PCHB No. 01-160 granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle property. Orders Port Of Seattle to confer with ACC counsel within two days to schedule site visits for ACC experts, counsel, paralegal, and two client representatives to observe, photograph, and sample wetlands, soils, and streams within
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005384: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule — PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed order from the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC)’s Motion to Extend Discovery Schedule. Extends time for ACC to depose Port Of Seattle witnesses from February 1, 2002, to February 25, 2002; extends filing of ACC’s final exhibit list from February 8, 2002, to March 1, 2002;
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-11

    EXH AR005408: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Subpoenas Duces Tecum — PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion filed January 11, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, seeking to compel Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) to produce all documents responsive to the Port’s Requests for Production propounded November 9, 2001. ACC refused to produce any documents in response to Request for Production
    TagsACC, Legal, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Japan Airlines plane strikes parked Delta plane at Sea-Tac Airport" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V