TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) interrogatories nos. 1-18 and requests for production nos. 1-6 directed to the Washington State Department of Ecology, filed in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Pursuant to PCHB October 30, 2001 Prehearing Order and Civil Rules 26, 33, and 34, ACC through counsel

Petition for Review of Agency Action filed January 8, 2002 in Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) against State of Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Department of Ecology, and Port of Seattle. Challenges three PCHB orders in ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) file an application for direct review by Washington Court of Appeals Division II of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) ‘Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification’ (PCHB No. 01-160), issued December 17, 2001, and appealed by Port Of Seattle to

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 denial of Certificates of Appealability filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) under RCW 34.05.518 and RCW 43.21B.320(5). ACC and CASE sought direct Court of Appeals review of Thurston County Superior Court petitions (Cause No. 02-2-00029-8 and Cause No. 01-2-02386-9) arising from the

Summary statement for deposition publication filed by ACC and CASE in PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle), pursuant to Board Order of March 19, 2002. Deponent Ray Hellwig, Director of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, deposed January 8, 2002 regarding procedure and basis for issuance of Sea-Tac 401

Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for summary judgment filed January 4, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, arguing that Ecology’s Section 401 Certification for the Port Of Seattle Third Runway project (Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update) should be invalidated because the Port lacks a water right to implement low flow

Declaration by attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman LLP, filed January 4, 2002, before the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160) in support of ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, related to construction of a Third Runway and

Proposed order from the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for summary judgment on Issue No. 9(a) — whether a water right is required for implementation of the Port of Seattle’s low flow mitigation plan for the Third Runway Project. The Board found no reasonable assurance of

Transmittal form from Parametrix, Inc. (Jim Kelley) to Ann Kenny, Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, dated January 3, 2002, transmitting pre-construction hydrologic monitoring data for wetlands near the Third Runway embankment at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Required by conditions D1g, D5, and D6g of Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1), September 23, 2001. Project Number 556-2912-01-01-41D,

Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County, challenging the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification related to the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Petitioner Port Of Seattle represented by Linda J. Strout, Traci M.