Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Evidentiary Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Evidentiary Order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case no. 01-160, filed March 12, 2002, in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order addresses admissibility of exhibits, witness order, exchange of exhibits, motions in limine (including one for David
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 002457: Pre-Hearing Brief of Port Of Seattle — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Pre-hearing brief filed by Port Of Seattle before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues that Ecology’s 401 water quality certification for the STIA third runway and Master Plan Update (MPU)
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-03-12

    EXH AR002508: Respondent Ecology’s Pre-Hearing Brief — ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Respondent Department of Ecology’s Pre-Hearing Brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) on March 12, 2002, in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology defends its Order No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1), the 401 Certification
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 002545: ACC Motion in Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion in limine filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking exclusion of plans and reports produced after the February 1, 2002 deadline set in the October 30, 2001 Prehearing Order. Motion specifically targets Ecology Exhibit 13203
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-11

    EXH AR002760: Motion in Limine to Quash Subpoena of Linda Logan, PCHB 01-160

    In March 2002, the Port of Seattle filed a motion asking the Pollution Control Hearings Board to quash a subpoena issued by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) seeking testimony from Dr. Linda Logan, an employee of consulting firm Parametrix. The Port argued two reasons for quashing: Dr. Logan did not appear on any party's final witness list as required by the Board's pre-hearing order, and the accompanying notice under Civil Rule 43(f) was improper because Dr. Logan was neither a party nor a managing agent of the Port of Seattle.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-11

    EXH AR002782: ACC Exhibit List — PCHB Hearing on STIA Third Runway, 401 Certification, and Stormwater Monitoring

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) exhibit list filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) proceedings (AR002782–AR002784) concerning Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway, WAC 173-201A water quality standards, NPDES Permit WA-002465-1, 401 Water Quality Certification, and STIA construction stormwater monitoring. Exhibits include depositions of Drabek and Yee, emails among Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung Yee, Peter Kmet, Craig Thompson, and
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-03-11

    EXH AR003052: Ecology’s Reply in Support of Motion in Limine Regarding WAC 371-08-475(7) — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Ecology’s reply brief supporting its Motion in Limine to preclude Thomas F. Luster from testifying as an expert witness for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160. Filed March 11, 2002 with the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Argues that Luster, a former Ecology Senior Expert on water quality certifications and lead
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-11

    PCHB Doc 03059: Declaration of Joan M. Marchioro — Ecology v. ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Joan M. Marchioro, attorney for Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), filed March 11, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Marchioro states she has no recollection of receiving communication from Tom Luster regarding his intent to submit sworn testimony to
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-11

    PCHB Doc 03061: Declaration of Thomas J. Young in Support of Motion to Strike — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Thomas J. Young, attorney for Washington State Department of Ecology, filed March 11, 2002 in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches seven exhibits including deposition excerpts of Thomas Luster,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-09

    PCHB AR 002066: ACC and CASE Prehearing Briefs — Table of Contents

    Table of contents for the prehearing briefs filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), received March 9, 2002. Document challenges Ecology’s issuance of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and CZMA certification for the Port Of Seattle’s Third Runway project, raising issues
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port of Seattle Home Noise Insulation Survey – Window Condensation Question" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V