Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMTCA(83)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1999-06-09

    EXH AR023644: Email Chain – Possible Utilization Ecology Contract Services (SAIC) Agreed Order Review STIA

    In a June 1999 email chain, Washington State Department of Ecology staff member Roger Nye proposed bringing in an outside consulting firm (SAIC) to help review technical groundwater studies related to an environmental cleanup agreement (Agreed Order) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). The goal was to add credibility and independence to Ecology's review process, particularly in response to public demands for an independent assessment. Nye also requested that the Port of Seattle agree to cover SAIC's costs as part of the overall project expenses under state cleanup regulations (MTCA).
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-26

    EXH AR023628: Email Chain — Ecology SAIC Contract Request, Third Runway Groundwater Study Funding

    In May 1999, Washington State Department of Ecology staff exchanged emails discussing plans to hire consulting firm SAIC to review groundwater studies at Sea-Tac Airport, with the question of whether the Port of Seattle would fund the work remaining unresolved. The emails also note that state legislation signed by the governor allocated $250,000 to study how construction of Sea-Tac's proposed Third Runway would impact aquifers beneath the airport, a move the Port viewed as an attempt to block the runway project. This created an unusual situation where two separate Ecology divisions were conducting potentially duplicative groundwater modeling studies at the airport for different purposes.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Julia Patterson, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-01

    EXH AR017691: Agreed Order #97TC-N122 — State of Washington Ecology vs. Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport

    Washington State Department of Ecology Agreed Order #97TC-N122 issued to Port Of Seattle for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), pursuant to RCW 70.105D.050(1). Documents hazardous substance releases within the Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA), a half-square-mile southeast quadrant of STIA operational since 1944. Contaminants identified include jet fuel (most abundant by bulk volume), gasoline, industrial
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 1999-05-01

    EXH AR042458: Agreed Order #97TC-N122 — State of Washington Ecology vs. Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport

    Agreed Order #97TC-N122 issued by Washington State Department of Ecology under RCW 70.105D.050(1) directed to Port Of Seattle regarding hazardous substance contamination at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Documents thirteen contaminated sites within the Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA), a 1/2 square-mile area in the southeast quadrant of the airport, contaminated with jet fuel, gasoline,
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 18
  • 1999-05-01

    EXH AR023630: STIA Ground Water Study — Public Participation Plan

    This 1999 plan, prepared jointly by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle, outlines how the public will be involved in a ground water study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The study was prompted by decades of jet fuel and petroleum product releases from underground storage tanks and fuel systems in the Airport's Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area, which contaminated soil and ground water across 13 known sites. The plan describes required and additional public participation activities, community outreach roles, and the two-phase study approach, which included computer modeling of ground water flow to assess contamination risks to public water supplies and surface water.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 10
  • 1999-03-24

    EXH AR019665: Hamm Creek Soil Quality Review — Memo Doan to Agid

    A 1999 internal Port of Seattle memorandum reviews soil quality data for the Hamm Creek Restoration Project site near Boeing Field, evaluating whether the material is safe to use as fill for a proposed third runway. The review found that detected contaminants — including PCBs, DDTs, mercury, and PAHs — fell below MTCA cleanup levels, leading to the conclusion that the material is suitable for upland fill use. While the soil did not meet PSDDA standards for open-water disposal, the memo notes that this distinction is not technically relevant given its intended use as runway fill.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 1999-01-01

    EXH AR034957: 1999 Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria

    Port Of Seattle 1999 Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria for STIA airfield projects, describing criteria and review process for acceptance of fill material requested by Washington Department of Ecology in conjunction with 401 Water Quality certification. Covers geotechnical and environmental suitability standards including MTCA Method A contaminant levels, arsenic, TPH and metals analyses. Details
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 1999-01-01

    EXH 286: 1999 Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria

    This 1999 Port of Seattle document outlines the criteria and review process for accepting soil fill material used in Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA) airfield construction projects. Fill material must come from approved sources—such as state-certified commercial borrow pits, contractor-certified construction sites, or Port-owned property—and generally must meet Washington State MTCA Method A environmental contamination standards. Contractors and suppliers are required to certify the quality of their materials, and independent soil technicians monitor all deliveries to ensure only safe, suitable fill is placed on airport grounds.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 1997-01-01

    Agreed Order #97TC-N122: Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Sea-Tac International Airport Hazardous Substance Contamination

    A 1997 Agreed Order issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology directed the Port of Seattle to address hazardous substance contamination at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Jet fuel, gasoline, industrial solvents, and other chemicals had been released across twelve separate sites within a half-square-mile Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area, impacting both soil and groundwater. The order established a framework for ongoing environmental investigation and cleanup while acknowledging the operational challenges of working in an active airport environment.
    TagsEcology, MTCA, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, soilFolderEcology
  • 1996-02-01

    Exhibit 2124: Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Levels and Risk Calculations (CLARC II) Update, February 1996

    Washington State Department of Ecology publication #94-145 (updated 1/96) presenting the February 1996 annual update to the MTCA (Model Toxics Control Act) Cleanup Standards under CLARC II. Covers Method B and Method C cleanup levels for soil and groundwater, reference doses (RfD), cancer potency factors, hazard quotients, WAC 173-340-740 and WAC 173-340-745 calculations, inhalation correction
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WACFolderBox 14

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR029210: 401 Permit Post-Issuance Clarification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Low Flow Analysis Meeting Notes" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V