TagEcology(797)

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) reply memorandum in support of its motion for a stay, filed October 10, 2001, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). Argues that the Amended Certification sets acceptable soil contamination levels too high to protect water quality, citing DOE expert Chung Yee’s 3-phase back-calculating model showing Antimony should be limited to

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) reply brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, opposing Ecology and Port of Seattle objections to ACC’s motion to file an overlength reply brief. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001 as No.

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160, signed by Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham on October 10, 2001. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion requesting permission to file an overlength reply brief simultaneously with the filing of the lengthy reply itself, in violation of an earlier order and stipulation. The Board reluctantly

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order on Motion to Strike in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology moved to strike references to an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by NW Regional Director Ray Hellwig for a senior management team meeting in April

Certificate of Service filed by Wendy S. Clement of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC on October 9, 2001 in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Documents served include: Port of Seattle’s Sur Reply Memorandum, Motion

Certificate of Service filed October 9, 2001 by Julie A. Bunting of Marten Brown Inc. (Olympia, WA) in PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Documents served include Port of Seattle’s Sur-Reply Memorandum, Motion to Shorten Time, Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, Second Declaration

Department of Ecology response in opposition to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) request to file an overlength reply brief in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, filed October 9, 2001. Ecology, represented by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro (WSBA #19250) and Thomas J. Young (WSBA #17366), joins Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike ACC’s

Department of Ecology sur-reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-133, PCHB No. 01-160) opposing ACC’s motion for a stay of the Amended 401 Certification for the Third Runway embankment project at Sea-Tac Airport. Ecology argues the Amended 401 Certification does not lessen water quality protections under Condition E (acceptable fill

Second Declaration of Erik Stockdale, filed October 9, 2001, in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Stockdale responds to ACC reply brief on motion for stay, asserting hydrologic monitoring has commenced downgradient of the embankment at

Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief filed October 9, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle argues ACC filed a 46-page reply memorandum exceeding the Board-ordered 30-page limit by more than 16 pages, violating WAC