Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-29

    EXH AR006279: Port Of Seattle’s Submittal of Record References Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay, PCHB 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s submittal of record references in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle), filed October 29, 2001, opposing ACC’s motion for stay. Lists declarations from James C. Kelley Ph.D., Katie Walter, Erik Stockdale, Paul S. Fendt, Joseph Brascher, Donald Weitkamp Ph.D., Ann Kenny, Edward O’Brien,
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR026132: Letter to Ecology Requesting Extension Low Streamflow Analysis & Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    In this October 24, 2001 letter, the Port of Seattle notified the Washington Department of Ecology of a mathematical error discovered in hydrological modeling software used to assess the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan's impacts on Miller and Walker Creeks. The error caused stream flow impacts to be overestimated at 1/24th of their actual value, meaning required mitigation facilities could be smaller than originally planned. As a result, the Port requested an extension of the Low Streamflow Analysis submittal deadline from November 5 to November 21, 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR006328: ACC Statement of Supplemental Authorities in Reply on ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) filing in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, submitting supplemental authorities in reply to ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration and responding to Ecology’s October 22, 2001 submission. Argues AAG statements on a ‘purely legal question’ regarding water rights for the low flow plan fall outside attorney-client
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2135: Port Of Seattle Fill Criteria — Processed Materials Specifications for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 among Ann Kenny (Ecology), Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Raymond Hellwig, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young (ATG), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Jim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-23

    PCHB Doc 6357: Ecology’s Reply to ACC’s Opposition to Ecology’s Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    Washington State Department of Ecology reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing Airport Communities Coalition’s (ACC) arguments against Ecology’s motion to strike attorney-client privileged documents. Ecology argues the privilege is not ‘at issue’ under Pappas v. Holloway (114 Wn.2d 198) and Hearn v. Rhay (68 F.R.D. 574), and that
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-10-18

    PCHB Doc 006371: Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon on Late Attachments to Stockdale Declaration — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160

    Declaration by Dyanne Sheldon filed October 18, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Sheldon asserts that additional well-log data submitted with Erik Stockdale’s October 15 declaration does not alter her prior October 10 conclusions: the Performance
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-18

    EXH AR006366: Declaration of Amanda Azous on Late Attachments to Stockdale Declaration — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration by Amanda Azous (wetland expert) filed October 18, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, concerning Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Azous reviews additional pages submitted by Ecology on October 15 as late additions
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Pre-Hearing Order

    Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed for review of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and RCW chapter 90.48 order issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued an amended 401 Certification on September
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-15

    PCHB Doc 6284: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Draft Pre-Hearing Order, PCHB No. 01-160

    Draft Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed appeal on August 23, 2001 of a section 401 Clean Water Act certification and order under RCW chapter 90.48 issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued amended
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "StART Federal Policy Working Group meeting summary, September 11, 2023" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V