Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(788)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-14

    PCHB Doc 2264: ACC and CASE Anticipated Order of Witnesses — PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) filed their Anticipated Order of Witnesses for PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, with respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. The document lists 16 witnesses in order: Sally Nelson, Ann Kenny, Tom
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-14

    EXH AR026985: March 14 Meeting Agenda — Columbia-Snake River Agreement, Metering Plan, Stormwater, Work Plan Priorities, Succession Planning

    AR026985, Exhibit 751. Meeting agenda for March 14 transmitted via fax from Rachael Paschal Osborn (509-328-8144) on March 17, 2002. Topics include Columbia-Snake River Agreement (Barwin/Phillips/Barbara Markham), Metering Plan review/decision (Barwin/Regional Section Managers/Slattery), transfer of inchoate ground water permits Part II (Barwin/Markham), stormwater to augment base flows as mitigation (Joan Marchioro), work plan priorities (Bonkowski),
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Roundtable, Stormwater, work planFolderBox 10
  • 2002-03-13

    PCHB Doc 002348: Declaration of Rachael Paschal Osborn in Support of ACC’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony from Dave Garland

    Declaration by Rachael Paschal Osborn, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed March 13, 2002, in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Supports ACC’s Motion in Limine to exclude testimony from Dave Garland, a witness for the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-12

    EXH AR002508: Respondent Ecology’s Pre-Hearing Brief — ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Respondent Department of Ecology’s Pre-Hearing Brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) on March 12, 2002, in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology defends its Order No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1), the 401 Certification
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 002545: ACC Motion in Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion in limine filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking exclusion of plans and reports produced after the February 1, 2002 deadline set in the October 30, 2001 Prehearing Order. Motion specifically targets Ecology Exhibit 13203
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 2552: Declaration of Michael P. Witek in Support of ACC’s Motion in Limine

    Declaration by Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman LLP filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, in support of ACC’s Motion in Limine. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Evidentiary Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Evidentiary Order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case no. 01-160, filed March 12, 2002, in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order addresses admissibility of exhibits, witness order, exchange of exhibits, motions in limine (including one for David
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-11

    EXH AR003052: Ecology’s Reply in Support of Motion in Limine Regarding WAC 371-08-475(7) — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Ecology’s reply brief supporting its Motion in Limine to preclude Thomas F. Luster from testifying as an expert witness for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160. Filed March 11, 2002 with the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Argues that Luster, a former Ecology Senior Expert on water quality certifications and lead
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-11

    PCHB Doc 03059: Declaration of Joan M. Marchioro — Ecology v. ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Joan M. Marchioro, attorney for Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), filed March 11, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Marchioro states she has no recollection of receiving communication from Tom Luster regarding his intent to submit sworn testimony to
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-11

    PCHB Doc 03061: Declaration of Thomas J. Young in Support of Motion to Strike — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Thomas J. Young, attorney for Washington State Department of Ecology, filed March 11, 2002 in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches seven exhibits including deposition excerpts of Thomas Luster,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 79
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V