Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagDes Moines Creek(162)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 273: Low Streamflow Analysis — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements

    This technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in three creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks) to assess the potential impacts of airport construction projects on summer water flows. Using a 47-year record of streamflow data and computer modeling tools, analysts determined target streamflow levels for each creek and evaluated how proposed runway and infrastructure improvements might affect seasonal low-flow periods critical to salmon habitat. The study found existing summer low streamflow targets of 0.33 cfs for Des Moines Creek, 0.77 cfs for Walker Creek, and 0.73 cfs for Miller Creek, which were used to guide mitigation planning.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR017886: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements

    Report prepared by Parametrix, Inc. with Aqua Terra Consultants, Earth Tech, Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, HNTB, and Pacific Groundwater Group for Port Of Seattle regarding Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. Analyzes summer low streamflow impacts to Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek from planned airport projects and proposes an offset facility using underground
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 464: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, assessing the hydrologic impacts of the proposed third runway embankment as part of the airport's Master Plan Update. The study found that the runway construction would reduce summer stream flows, requiring mitigation of 0.11 cfs in Walker Creek and 0.08 cfs in Des Moines Creek during the annual low-flow period (late July through October). To offset these impacts, the Port of Seattle proposed collecting and storing excess winter stormwater in underground vaults—approximately 18.5 acre-feet for Walker Creek and 13.5 acre-feet for Des Moines Creek—for controlled release during dry-season low-flow periods.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR017588: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regarding Port Of Seattle Low Flow Mitigation, Third Runway

    Letter dated November 26, 2001, from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (on behalf of ACC, Airport Communities Coalition) to Colonel Ralph H. Graves, Ms. Muffy Walker, and Ms. Gail Terzi of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Corps Ref. No. 1996-4-02325. Identifies serious flaws in Port Of Seattle’s low flow mitigation analysis for Miller Creek, Walker
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 247: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to Army Corps — STIA Third Runway Low Flow Mitigation Deficiencies

    A November 2001 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious technical objections to the Port of Seattle's proposed plan to manage low streamflow impacts from SeaTac Airport's third runway construction on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. The letter argues that the Port's analysis contains critical flaws, including an incorrect assumption that virtually all runway runoff infiltrates into adjacent grassed filter strips, and that the use of hourly rather than shorter time intervals in hydrological modeling causes stream impacts to be underestimated and mitigation storage facilities to be undersized. The consultants also express concern that the Port was not adequately addressing outstanding public comments or certification requirements set by regulatory agencies such as the Washington Department of Ecology.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-11-07

    EXH AR026126: HSPF Modeling Notes — Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks; HSPF-Hydrus/Slice Linkages

    A 2001 technical memo from Hydrocomp, Inc.'s Norm Crawford outlines recommendations for hydrological modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport's new runways and taxiways. The document describes how surface runoff and groundwater flow from both impervious runway surfaces and surrounding pervious grasslands should be calculated and linked across three modeling tools: HSPF, Hydrus, and the Slice model. Key recommendations include properly accounting for infiltration, reducing till seepage by 33% for inactive groundwater recharge, and reconciling discrepancies in land area calculations between the different models.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR026273: Parametrix Transmittal & Responses to ACOE Questions Oct 26 2001 STIA MPU Natural Resource Mitigation

    This November 2001 document from Parametrix, Inc. contains responses to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers questions regarding the Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update's natural resource mitigation project. It addresses technical questions about wetland mapping, watershed basin sizes, low-flow analysis, and cumulative wetland impacts across the Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek basins, showing projected wetland acreage reductions of approximately 3-4% with the project. The document also covers mitigation measures including wetland restoration sites and performance standards for invasive species control.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR023792: Notes HSPF Modeling Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks — HSPF/Hydrus/Slice Linkages

    This technical memo from Hydrocomp, Inc. (authored by Norm Crawford) outlines recommendations for improving hydrological computer modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's new runway construction. It describes how rainfall and runoff from the new impervious runway and taxiway surfaces and surrounding pervious grasslands are tracked through a linked series of models (HSPF, Hydrus, and Slice) to estimate groundwater movement and seepage through underlying soil layers. The document identifies several discrepancies in the existing model setup and recommends corrections to better account for water flow paths, drainage areas, and groundwater recharge in the fill areas created by airport expansion.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023564: Letter Water Resources Consulting (Peter Willing) to Army Corps & Ecology — STIA Sec 404/401 Permit Low Flow Analysis & Flow Impact Offset Facility

    A water resources consultant, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, argues that the Port of Seattle's July 2001 Low Flow Analysis for Sea-Tac Airport expansion fails to provide reasonable assurance that the project will meet water quality standards in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. The letter criticizes the submission as incomplete and rushed, noting missing figures, unfinished sections, and an unresolved plan to store the required 46 acre-feet of stormwater across the three watersheds. The consultant contends that the Port's proposed water quality protections—including filtration, aeration, and biofiltration swales—are unproven, inadequately designed, and fall short of the regulatory standard required for Section 401/404 permit approval.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023128: Letter from Columbia Biological Assessments to Army Corps of Engineers and Ecology re Port Of Seattle Low Flow Analysis/Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    A biological scientist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed the Port of Seattle's plan to store airport stormwater in detention vaults and release it into Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks during summer low-flow periods. The review found that the plan could worsen water quality in those creeks, because stored sediments may release toxic levels of copper and zinc, and potentially harbor human pathogens from airplane wastewater. The scientist concluded that regulators lacked sufficient information to approve the proposal without further testing, modeling, and independent scientific review.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 … Page 17
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "FAA Operations & Performance Data" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V