Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCASE(182)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-09-10

    AR 000557: ACC Notice of Appearance — Port Of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Notice of Appearance filed September 10, 2002 in King County Superior Court, case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA. ACC, represented by Peter J. Eglick, Kevin L. Stock, and Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman LLP, and Rachael Paschal Osborn (WSBA #21618), enters appearance as Respondent in Port Of Seattle’s appeal of Pollution Control
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-09-10

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Disposing of Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8 of Final Order

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) order in PCHB No. 01-160 disposing of Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8, filed August 22, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) both opposed the petition. Port Of Seattle withdrew the petition on September 3, 2002 prior to a scheduled conference call.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-09-06

    PCHB Doc 561: Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in King County Superior Court (case no. 02-2-25658-9SEA) under RCW 34.05 (Administrative Procedure Act), challenging the August 12, 2002 final order of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160) regarding the 401 Certification issued by Washington Department of Ecology on September 21, 2001 for the
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-09-05

    PCHB Doc 756: Proposed Order Disposing of Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8 of Final Order — PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed order submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for Washington State in PCHB No. 01-160, disposing of Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8 of the Final Order. Filed by Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC on September 5, 2002. Port Of Seattle filed the petition on August 22, 2002; ACC (Airport
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-09-01

    PCHB Doc 7: Order Granting Certificate of Appealability — ACC & CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB 01-160

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Certificate of Appealability in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and William H. Lynch granted direct review requests by both ACC/CASE and Port Of Seattle to the Court of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-08-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8

    Port Of Seattle petition filed August 22, 2002 with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) requesting reconsideration of Condition 8 of the Final Order dated August 12, 2002, which prohibited use of the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) to authorize importation of fill exceeding modified fill criteria. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC)
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-07-24

    EXH AR000913: ACC Notice of Supplemental Authority — PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) file a Notice of Supplemental Authority in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board, citing two Washington State Supreme Court decisions issued July 18, 2002: Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. Washington Department of Ecology (Docket No.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Supreme Court Of WashingtonFolderBox 01
  • 2002-05-31

    EXH AR001007: CASE’s Concurrence in ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions

    PCHB No. 01-160. Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), represented by Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney P.L.L.C. (WSBA #27782), concurs with and joins Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Correction, Clarification, and Reconsideration of the Order Publishing Depositions, filed May 31, 2002, received by Environmental Hearings Office June 4, 2002. Respondents are Washington State
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-05-31

    PCHB Doc 1013: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions

    Respondent State of Washington Department of Ecology concurs with and joins Port Of Seattle’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions, PCHB No. 01-160. Filed May 31, 2002, signed by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro, Jeff B. Kray, and
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law — Ecology and Port Of Seattle v. ACC and CASE

    Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle in PCHB Case No. 01-160, received May 22, 2002. Document addresses appeal by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) of the §401 Clean Water Act Certification (33 U.S.C. §1341) issued by Ecology
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 … Page 19
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Trump Administration Environmental-Justice-Related Executive Orders: Potential Implications for EPA Programs" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V