Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(268)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-18

    RP Day 1: PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port, Mar 18 2002

    This document is a transcript of legal proceedings held March 18, 2002, before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in a case where the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing, which ran for ten days through March 29, 2002, was conducted at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington. Attorneys representing community groups, the state attorney general's office, and the Port of Seattle all appeared before a three-member board panel.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB Doc 002197: ACC Reply on Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply brief in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses at hearing. Filed March 18, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Argues CR 32 allows depositions of officers, directors, or managing agents of governmental agencies to be used
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB No. 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    This document records a 2002 Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case in which community groups challenged the water quality certification issued for the construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Airport Expansion argued that the Department of Ecology's approval did not provide adequate assurance that the project would comply with Clean Water Act Section 401 and state water quality laws, particularly regarding stormwater management. The Board examined 20 disputed issues covering topics such as stormwater impacts, detention system safety, and the scope of the certification.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, pollution, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 002259: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 36(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Proposed order in PCHB No. 01-160 granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR 36(b)(6) designated witnesses. Depositions of Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, Gordon White, John Drabek, Ray Hellwig, Tom Fitzsimmons, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Peter Kmet admitted into the record for any purpose.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB No. 01-160, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion in limine to exclude late-filed plans and reports submitted by respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Excluded exhibits include Exhibit No. 1320 (Embankment Modeling Report), Exhibit No.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled testimony (with errata corrections) of Joseph Brascher of AQUA TERRA Consultants submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Brascher testifies regarding low streamflow hydrologic modeling at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-14

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Proposed Order Granting ACC’s Motion In Limine To Exclude Testimony of Ecology’s Dave Garland

    Proposed order in PCHB No. 01-160 granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion in limine to exclude testimony of Washington State Department of Ecology witness Dave Garland. Order bars Ecology from offering Dave Garland’s pre-filed testimony at hearing and precludes reliance on March 6, 2002 memoranda from Dave Garland to
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-14

    PCHB Doc 2264: ACC and CASE Anticipated Order of Witnesses — PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) filed their Anticipated Order of Witnesses for PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, with respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. The document lists 16 witnesses in order: Sally Nelson, Ann Kenny, Tom
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-14

    EXH AR002281: Port Of Seattle’s Anticipated Order of Witnesses — PCHB 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s anticipated order of witnesses filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, dated March 14, 2002. Lists 16 witnesses including Elizabeth M. Leavitt, Keith Smith, Charles S. Wisdom Ph.D., Donald E. Weitkamp Ph.D., Paul S. Fendt P.E.,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-12

    PCHB Doc 002457: Pre-Hearing Brief of Port Of Seattle — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Pre-hearing brief filed by Port Of Seattle before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues that Ecology’s 401 water quality certification for the STIA third runway and Master Plan Update (MPU)
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 … Page 27
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "250528 tsa touchless id hero" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V