TagAirport Communities Coalition(272)
-
2002-04-04
PCHB Doc 002039: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160
Certificate of Service filed April 4, 2002 by Michael Dennis of Helsell Fetterman LLP on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand delivery on March 14, 2002 of Appellants’ Responses to Ecology/Port Objections and Counter-excerpts of published depositions, and proposed revisions to Outline -
2002-04-02
PCHB Doc 01-160: Post-Hearing Procedural Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle
Post-Hearing Procedural Order in PCHB case 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Presiding officer Kaleen Cottingham memorializes post-hearing activities and deadlines: deposition submissions due April 4, 2002; exhibit matrix finalization with stipulated/admitted/limited-purpose designations; revised pre-filed testimony of Dave Garland -
2002-03-29
RP Day 10: PCHB No. 01-160 ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port (Mar 29, 2002)
This document is a transcript from Day Ten (March 29, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Lacey, Washington, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over airport expansion issues. The ten-day hearing, which began March 18, 2002, was presided over by board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and Bill Lynch. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved multiple attorneys representing community groups opposing Sea-Tac Airport expansion and respondents from the state attorney general's office and private firms representing the Port of Seattle. -
2002-03-28
Transcript, Day 9: ACC and CASE vs. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160, Day Nine Proceedings
Transcript of Day Nine proceedings before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), March 28, 2002, Lacey, Washington. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants versus State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents. Board members: Kaleen Cottingham (presiding), Robert Jensen (Board Chair), -
2002-03-28
RP Day 9: ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 28 2002
This is a transcript from Day Nine (March 28, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing took place in Lacey, Washington, and involved attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending it. -
2002-03-27
RP Day 8: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160
This document is a transcript from Day Eight (March 27, 2002) of a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing was held at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington, before a three-member board. Attorneys representing community groups, the state, and the Port of Seattle all appeared to argue issues related to the airport's environmental and noise impacts on surrounding communities. -
2002-03-26
RP Day 7: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 26 2002
This document is a transcript from Day Seven of a 2002 hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The proceedings, held in Lacey, Washington from March 26–29, 2002, involved attorneys representing community groups, state environmental regulators, and the Port of Seattle. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) reflects community opposition to the airport's expansion and related environmental and noise concerns. -
2002-03-25
RP Day 6: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port — PCHB No. 01-160, March 25, 2002
This document is a transcript from Day Six (March 25, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing, held in Lacey, Washington, featured attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending their positions. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) was part of a broader legal effort by neighboring communities to scrutinize the environmental impacts of the airport's growth. -
2002-03-22
PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Strike Certain Pre-Filed Testimony and Limit Oral Testimony
Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 22, 2002, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to strike certain pre-filed testimony and limit oral testimony. Board presided by Kaleen Cottingham established February 28, 2002 as discovery cut-off date; parties prohibited from relying on information created after that date. Order restricts Port of Seattle -
2002-03-22
RP Day 5: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160
This is a transcript from Day Five (March 22, 2002) of a ten-day administrative hearing held before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board in Lacey, Washington. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenging the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Attorneys representing all four parties appeared before a three-member board chaired by Robert V. Jensen.