Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(272)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-05

    Exhibit 227: Port Of Seattle’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to ACC, with Answers and Responses — PCHB No. 01-160

    This document contains legal discovery materials from a Pollution Control Hearings Board case in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) challenged the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology over the Sea-Tac Third Runway Project. The Port of Seattle submitted interrogatories asking ACC to identify its expert witnesses and their prior testimony histories, to which ACC objected as overbroad and burdensome. Expert witnesses from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, including Bill Rozeboom and Malcolm Leytham, are listed along with their prior cases involving stormwater and water quality issues relevant to the runway project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-27

    PCHB Doc 3203: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony of Dr. Pat Lucia

    Certificate of Service filed February 27, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery of ACC’s and CASE’s (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witness Dr. Pat Lucia to respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH AR003201: Erratum to Respondent Port Of Seattle’s List of Witnesses and Exhibits

    Erratum filed by Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) correcting Item No. 136 in the witness and exhibit list. Corrects dates for Parametrix, Inc. draft memorandum to Port Of Seattle project files titled ‘Range-finding water-effect ratio results’ (authors L. Logan and D.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH 457: Second Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Supporting ACC Motion for Stay (PCHB Nos. 01-133, 01-160)

    This legal declaration by Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed in a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case, argues that the Department of Ecology lacks reasonable assurance that fill material used to construct the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway embankment meets environmental safety standards. Dr. Lucia contends that the certification allows soil concentrations of arsenic and other metals — including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and nickel — that significantly exceed Puget Sound natural background levels. He also criticizes the Port of Seattle's soil sampling approach as arbitrary and unscientific, asserting it fails to meet accepted environmental engineering standards for contaminant testing.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc AR003205: Port Of Seattle Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum supporting its motion for partial summary judgment on Issue No. 14 (‘Did Ecology and the Port comply with SEPA?’) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) lacks
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc 3214: Declaration of Roger A. Pearce Supporting Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for Port Of Seattle, filed February 25, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue. Identifies and authenticates three exhibits from the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-20

    PCHB Doc 003607: Ecology’s Final List of Witnesses and Exhibits — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle)

    Respondent State of Washington Department of Ecology’s final list of witnesses and exhibits filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 11 witnesses including Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Katie Walter
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR003709: Ecology Memorandum in Response to Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — PCHB No. 01-160

    Washington State Department of Ecology memorandum supporting Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA compliance issue in PCHB No. 01-160. Filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro, Thomas J. Young, and Jeff B. Kray. Ecology argues ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR021775: ACC First Supplemental Response to RFP No. 2 & Interrogatory No. 5 — Expert Witness Reference List

    This legal document is a supplemental response filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case (No. 01-160) against the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It lists scientific references and studies relied upon by ACC's expert witnesses, covering topics such as the effects of airport deicing chemicals on water quality, dissolved oxygen levels in receiving streams, fluoride impacts on salmon, and toxicity of stormwater runoff to aquatic life near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Deicing, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 2002-02-08

    EXH 298: Declaration Paul Fendt Supporting Opposition ACC Motion Partial Summary Judgment

    This declaration by Paul Fendt, a licensed civil engineer with over 18 years of stormwater experience, was submitted in support of the Port of Seattle's opposition to the Airport Communities Coalition's motion in a 2001 Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board case. Fendt explains how new airport development and impervious surfaces can impact local waterways by increasing runoff and reducing groundwater recharge, and describes the stormwater management systems required by the Washington Department of Ecology for the Port of Seattle's Master Plan Update projects. The document provides technical background on stormwater best management practices (BMPs) and regulatory requirements under Washington State and federal Clean Water Act permits.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 … Page 28
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5187" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V