Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(279)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 015773: ACC v. DOE/PORT — Certificate of Service, Prefiled Testimony, PCHB No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed March 7, 2002 by Holly Simmelink, Certified PLS, of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160, Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Certifies service of prefiled testimony of 16 witnesses: Michael
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 07
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR016335: Pre-Filed Direct Testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. — PCHB 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pre-filed direct testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. AR 016335. Testimony covers stormwater impacts from the MPU (Master Plan Update) improvements at Sea-Tac Airport, including
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 07
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003184: Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160

    Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Marten Brown Inc. withdraws as counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle and is replaced by Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC, with Gillis E. Reavis (WSBA #21451) signing for both
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003187: Port Of Seattle Joinder in Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475 (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, WACFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-05

    Exhibit 227: Port Of Seattle’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to ACC, with Answers and Responses — PCHB No. 01-160

    This document contains legal discovery materials from a Pollution Control Hearings Board case in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) challenged the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology over the Sea-Tac Third Runway Project. The Port of Seattle submitted interrogatories asking ACC to identify its expert witnesses and their prior testimony histories, to which ACC objected as overbroad and burdensome. Expert witnesses from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, including Bill Rozeboom and Malcolm Leytham, are listed along with their prior cases involving stormwater and water quality issues relevant to the runway project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2002-03-05

    PCHB Doc 3146: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160

    Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster responds to Ecology’s Motion in Limine seeking to strike portions of his pre-filed testimony on grounds he is serving as an expert witness. Luster asserts
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-27

    PCHB Doc 3203: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony of Dr. Pat Lucia

    Certificate of Service filed February 27, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery of ACC’s and CASE’s (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witness Dr. Pat Lucia to respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH AR003201: Erratum to Respondent Port Of Seattle’s List of Witnesses and Exhibits

    Erratum filed by Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) correcting Item No. 136 in the witness and exhibit list. Corrects dates for Parametrix, Inc. draft memorandum to Port Of Seattle project files titled ‘Range-finding water-effect ratio results’ (authors L. Logan and D.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH 457: Second Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Supporting ACC Motion for Stay (PCHB Nos. 01-133, 01-160)

    This legal declaration by Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed in a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case, argues that the Department of Ecology lacks reasonable assurance that fill material used to construct the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway embankment meets environmental safety standards. Dr. Lucia contends that the certification allows soil concentrations of arsenic and other metals — including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and nickel — that significantly exceed Puget Sound natural background levels. He also criticizes the Port of Seattle's soil sampling approach as arbitrary and unscientific, asserting it fails to meet accepted environmental engineering standards for contaminant testing.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc AR003205: Port Of Seattle Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum supporting its motion for partial summary judgment on Issue No. 14 (‘Did Ecology and the Port comply with SEPA?’) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) lacks
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPAFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 … Page 28
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V