Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB No. 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    This document records a 2002 Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case in which community groups challenged the water quality certification issued for the construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Airport Expansion argued that the Department of Ecology's approval did not provide adequate assurance that the project would comply with Clean Water Act Section 401 and state water quality laws, particularly regarding stormwater management. The Board examined 20 disputed issues covering topics such as stormwater impacts, detention system safety, and the scope of the certification.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, pollution, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB Doc 2193: ACC Reply Brief in Support of Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Ecology Witness Dave Garland

    Appellants’ reply brief filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting motion in limine to exclude testimony of Washington State Department of Ecology witness Dave Garland regarding the Port of Seattle’s December 17, 2001 Low Flow Plan. ACC argues Ecology violated CR 26(e)(1)(B) duty to supplement interrogatory responses and the Board’s Pre-Hearing
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB Doc 002197: ACC Reply on Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply brief in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses at hearing. Filed March 18, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Argues CR 32 allows depositions of officers, directors, or managing agents of governmental agencies to be used
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-18

    PCHB Doc 01-160: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) challenge the Port Of Seattle’s Section 401 Water Quality Certification issued September 21, 2001, by Washington State Department of Ecology for construction of the Third Runway and related projects at
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-17

    PCHB Doc 002182: ACC Appellants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Strike the Port’s Pre-Hearing Brief

    Appellants’ reply brief filed March 17, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) via Helsell Fetterman LLP and Smith & Lowney PLLC, supporting their motion to strike the Port of Seattle’s pre-hearing brief. ACC argues the Port manipulated double-spacing in Microsoft Word to stuff additional lines
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. — Wetland Impacts and Mitigation, Sea-Tac Airport MPU

    Prefiled direct testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. (Parametrix, Inc.) submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington, Case No. PCHB 01-160, on behalf of respondents Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, against appellants Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE). Kelley testifies as principal consulting
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled testimony (with errata corrections) of Joseph Brascher of AQUA TERRA Consultants submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Brascher testifies regarding low streamflow hydrologic modeling at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 002201: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Exclude Testimony from Dave Garland

    Ecology’s response filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing ACC’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Dave Garland regarding the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Flow Plan and groundwater modeling for embankment fill. Ecology argues ACC was aware of Garland’s role through interrogatory answers, his January 9, 2002 deposition,
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    EXH AR002205: Ecology’s Response to ACC and CASE Motion in Limine to Exclude “Late-Produced” Plans and Reports

    Respondent Washington State Department of Ecology concurs with and joins Port Of Seattle’s response to Appellants’ Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) Motion in Limine to Exclude “Late-Produced” Plans and Reports, filed March 15, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160. Signed by Assistant Attorneys General Jeff B. Kray (WSBA #22174), Joan M.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-03-15

    EXH AR002206: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Publish Depositions, PCHB No. 01-160

    State of Washington Department of Ecology’s response opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion under CR 32(a)(2) to publish over 1,424 pages of deposition transcripts in lieu of direct testimony in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology argues depositions of Fitzsimmons, White, Hellwig, Kenny, Stockdale, Drabek, Fitzpatrick, and Kmet are inadmissible, that ACC failed to timely file the
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V