January 2, 2002August 2, 2026

PCHB AR005758: Port Of Seattle Petition for Review of PCHB Order Granting Motion to Stay Section 401 Certification (Third Runway)

Notes

Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County, challenging the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification related to the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Petitioner Port Of Seattle represented by Linda J. Strout, Traci M. Goodwin, Jay J. Manning, Gillis E. Reavis (Marten Brown Inc.), Roger A. Pearce, and Steven G. Jones (Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC). Respondents include PCHB, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE), and Washington Department of Ecology. Document describes FAA-approved Master Plan Update including 8,500-foot parallel runway at STIA, Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) EIS process, King County, and regional air transportation capacity needs. AR005758.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message