Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled testimony (with errata corrections) of Joseph Brascher of AQUA TERRA Consultants submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Brascher testifies regarding low streamflow hydrologic modeling at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC and CASE Motion to Strike the Port’s Pre-Hearing Brief

    Port Of Seattle’s response filed March 15, 2002 to Appellants’ motion to strike the Port’s pre-hearing brief in PCHB No. 01-160. Port argues the Board should deny the motion, noting that ACC and CASE jointly filed a 60-page brief by combining their page allowances and used 117 single-spaced 10-point footnotes containing substantive argument to circumvent
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 002230: ACC Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Motion filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, seeking leave to publish depositions of Ecology director Tom Fitzsimmons, Gordon White (Director of Shorelands and Environmental Assistance), and Northwest Region Director Ray Hellwig under CR 32(a)(2), plus CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 002259: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 36(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Proposed order in PCHB No. 01-160 granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR 36(b)(6) designated witnesses. Depositions of Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, Gordon White, John Drabek, Ray Hellwig, Tom Fitzsimmons, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Peter Kmet admitted into the record for any purpose.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB No. 01-160, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion in limine to exclude late-filed plans and reports submitted by respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Excluded exhibits include Exhibit No. 1320 (Embankment Modeling Report), Exhibit No.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 002201: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Exclude Testimony from Dave Garland

    Ecology’s response filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing ACC’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Dave Garland regarding the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Flow Plan and groundwater modeling for embankment fill. Ecology argues ACC was aware of Garland’s role through interrogatory answers, his January 9, 2002 deposition,
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-15

    EXH AR002205: Ecology’s Response to ACC and CASE Motion in Limine to Exclude “Late-Produced” Plans and Reports

    Respondent Washington State Department of Ecology concurs with and joins Port Of Seattle’s response to Appellants’ Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) Motion in Limine to Exclude “Late-Produced” Plans and Reports, filed March 15, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160. Signed by Assistant Attorneys General Jeff B. Kray (WSBA #22174), Joan M.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-15

    EXH AR002206: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Publish Depositions, PCHB No. 01-160

    State of Washington Department of Ecology’s response opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion under CR 32(a)(2) to publish over 1,424 pages of deposition transcripts in lieu of direct testimony in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology argues depositions of Fitzsimmons, White, Hellwig, Kenny, Stockdale, Drabek, Fitzpatrick, and Kmet are inadmissible, that ACC failed to timely file the
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. — Wetland Impacts and Mitigation, Sea-Tac Airport MPU

    Prefiled direct testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. (Parametrix, Inc.) submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington, Case No. PCHB 01-160, on behalf of respondents Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, against appellants Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE). Kelley testifies as principal consulting
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-14

    PCHB Doc 002338: ACC Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony From Ecology’s Dave Garland

    Motion in limine filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, seeking exclusion of prefiled and hearing testimony from Ecology witness Dave Garland. ACC argues Ecology failed to disclose Garland’s March 6, 2002 memo reviewing Pacific Ground Water Group (PGG) embankment modeling
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Airport Improvement October 2024" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V