Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPCHB(607)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-15

    EXH AR021642: Water Quality Monitoring RP 00-101B — Columbia Analytical Services to ACC

    A March 15, 2001 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services sent to John Strand of the Airport Communities Coalition, summarizing water quality test results from samples submitted on February 28, 2001. The report, assigned service request number K2101434, confirms all analyses were conducted under the laboratory's quality assurance program. It includes reference sheets defining technical acronyms and data qualifiers used in interpreting inorganic, metals, and organic test results.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-03-09

    EXH 384: Email Beaver to Bailey — 3R Embankment Subgrade Improvement Zones HC Rational

    This internal engineering memo from Jamie Beaver to Mike Bailey, dated March 9, 2001, outlines the process used to determine subgrade improvement zones for a 3R embankment stability project. The analysis focused on liquefaction risks, using post-liquefaction undrained residual shear strength (PLURSS) values derived from seismic reanalysis, ultimately recommending improvement zone widths of 100–120 feet depending on location. The memo notes that factors of safety for the liquefaction and pseudo-static cases generally ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 across various zones.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-08

    EXH 377D: Columbia Analytical Services Water Quality Monitoring Results & Data Qualifiers — ACC SR K2101258

    A March 8, 2001 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services sent to John Strand of the Airport Communities Coalition in Richland, WA, presents water quality monitoring results (project 00-101B) from samples submitted on February 20, 2001. The report includes standard data qualifiers and acronym definitions used to interpret inorganic, metals, and organic analytical results. All analyses were conducted under the laboratory's quality assurance program.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-03-02

    EXH AR021820: GeoSyntec Correction Comment #7 Pseudo-Static Seismic Stability Third Runway Wall ACC Technical Review

    In March 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a correction to a technical review letter concerning the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, clarifying that the seismic stability analysis used by Hart Crowser may seriously overestimate—not underestimate—the wall's ability to withstand earthquake loads. The firm argued that analyzing only the failure surface with the lowest static safety factor, rather than independently searching for the critical seismic failure surface, is an incorrect methodology. GeoSyntec recommended a proper pseudo-static slope stability analysis to ensure adequate ground improvement measures are applied in the right areas.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH 308: Email Fendt to Ludwa – Specific Information Needs TESC NHC Comment 20

    In a March 2001 email exchange, Paul Fendt responds to Ken Ludwa regarding specific information requests related to TESC (Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control) facilities, calling the level of detail requested 'absurd.' The information requests from Ludwa included clearing limits, tributary areas for ESC facilities, pump sizes, power supply specifications, spill prevention plans, and the expected duration of temporary facilities. The document appears to be part of an administrative record related to construction or environmental control planning at or near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Construction, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-26

    EXH AR021605: Columbia Analytical Svcs Water/Sediment Quality Monitoring Lab Results Ltr SR K2101038

    A February 2001 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services transmits water and sediment quality monitoring results to Columbia Biological Assessments in Richland, Washington, under service request K2101038. The report confirms that all analyses were conducted in accordance with the laboratory's quality assurance program, with samples received on February 12, 2001 and preliminary results faxed on February 23, 2001. The accompanying documentation includes standard data qualifier codes for inorganic, metals, and organic results used to interpret analytical findings.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-02-21

    EXH AR025289: Five-Year Project RP — Des Moines Water Quality Monitoring Program

    This February 2001 report by Herrera Environmental Consultants presents a five-year summary of water quality monitoring conducted for the City of Des Moines, Washington, covering three creek basins: Des Moines Creek, Massey Creek, and North Fork McSorley Creek. The report examines a range of water quality parameters including temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, metals, nutrients, turbidity, and fecal coliform bacteria, as well as benthic invertebrate conditions as indicators of stream health. It was prepared for the City's Surface Water Management Utility and provides data intended to inform stormwater and surface water management decisions in the Des Moines area near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH AR023598: ACC Comment Letter Opposing STIA Third Runway 401 Certification and 404 Permit

    A February 2001 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, representing the Airport Communities Coalition (cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and the Highline School District), urges the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology to deny the Port of Seattle's permits for the proposed Sea-Tac third runway. The letter argues that the Port had already spent nearly $300 million on construction before receiving required Clean Water Act approvals, and that its application lacked adequate stormwater management plans and failed to meet water quality standards. Independent experts retained by the coalition found the Port's environmental mitigation proposals to be technically flawed, incomplete, and legally insufficient.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-14

    Exhibit 158: Ecology Informational Meeting Notes with Erik and Ann, 2-14-01

    Handwritten notes from an Ecology informational meeting with Erik and Ann dated February 14, 2001 (AR 018355-018357). Topics include stormwater plan analysis from Kelly Whiting and John Drybeck (water quality staff), Vasen Farm farmed wetland ratios (1:1 in-basin acreage, 2:1 out-of-basin replacement), enforcement vs. restoration, prior converted designation, Corps of Engineers wetland determinations, 509 overpass,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2001-02-13

    EXH AR023568: CV Patrick C. Lucia, GeoSyntec Consultants

    This document is a professional curriculum vitae for Patrick C. Lucia, a civil engineer and Principal at GeoSyntec Consultants specializing in geotechnical engineering, landslides, and slope stability. It details his education, professional registrations, career history, and representative project experience, including bridge seismic reviews, landslide repairs, and reservoir stability evaluations in California. Note: This document does not appear to contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, EIS, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 … Page 61
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aerial View of Sea-Tac Airport Looking North, with Puget Sound in Background" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V