Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNinth Circuit Court of Appeals(31)

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit covers WA, OR and CA. It is the venue for cases concerning the FAA and Sea-Tac Airport. Although it consists of 29 judges, generally cases are heard by a mix of three judges, randomly assigned every month.

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2018-06-11

    City of Burien v. FAA, Case 18-71705: Full Docket, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

    The City of Burien filed a petition for review against the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in June 2018, challenging an FAA decision in what is believed to be a dispute related to air traffic and noise policy near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The case went through mediation, multiple briefing schedule extensions, and motions to supplement the record before the FAA filed its answering brief in March 2019. Key filings include Burien's opening brief submitted in late November 2018 and the FAA's certified administrative record, reflecting a formal appellate challenge to federal aviation authority decisions affecting the Burien community.
    TagsCaselaw, City of Burien, FAA, Litigation, Ninth Circuit Court of AppealsFolderCATEX 250 Turn
  • 18 71705 burien v FAA full docket pdf 1
    2018-06-11

    City of Burien v. FAA, Case 18-71705: Full Docket, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

    The City of Burien filed a petition for review against the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in June 2018, challenging an FAA decision in what is believed to be a dispute related to air traffic and noise policy near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The case went through mediation, multiple briefing schedule extensions, and motions to supplement the record before the FAA filed its answering brief in March 2019. Key filings include Burien's opening brief submitted in late November 2018 and the FAA's certified administrative record, reflecting a formal appellate challenge to federal aviation authority decisions affecting the Burien community.
    TagsCaselaw, City of Burien, FAA, Litigation, Ninth Circuit Court of AppealsFolderBurien
  • 2017-08-03

    Barnes v. Federal Aviation Administration – Ninth Circuit Court Opinion

    A federal appeals court denied a challenge by Oregon residents and an aviation watchdog group against a new runway project at Hillsboro Airport near Portland, Oregon. The court found that the Federal Aviation Administration acted properly in concluding the project would have no significant environmental impact, including only a minimal effect on air traffic and air quality. This case, a follow-up to a 2011 ruling, may be relevant to discussions of how environmental reviews are conducted for airport expansion projects in the Pacific Northwest.
    TagsFAA, FONSI, Hillsboro Airport, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Oregon Aviation WatchFolderFAA
  • 2017-02-14

    City of Burien v. FAA (Case 17-70438): Selected Docket Entries, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

    Selected docket entries for Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case 17-70438, City of Burien v. Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta. Covers petition for review filed 02/14/2017 through 05/17/2018, including extensive mediation conference schedule, multiple extensions of administrative record filing deadlines, and repeated amendments to briefing schedule for petitioner’s opening brief and respondent’s answering
    TagsCity of Burien, FAA, Litigation, Ninth Circuit Court of AppealsFolderCATEX 250 Turn
  • 2016-03-04

    City of Mukilteo v. U.S. Department of Transportation: Ninth Circuit Opinion on FAA Environmental Review for Paine Field Commercial Service

    A federal appeals court denied a challenge by the cities of Mukilteo and Edmonds, Washington, along with local residents and advocacy groups, to the FAA's decision to open Paine Field near Everett to commercial passenger service without requiring a full Environmental Impact Statement. The court ruled that the FAA's environmental review process was conducted in good faith and was not arbitrary or capricious, finding that the agency properly assessed foreseeable noise and environmental impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act.
    TagsAirport Law, City of Mukilteo, FAA, NEPA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Paine FieldFolderMukilteo
  • 2004-05-26

    Letter to Peter Eglick re ACC v. Graves, et al., No. 04-35011 (9th Cir.)

    In a May 26, 2004 letter, Port of Seattle Senior Counsel Traci M. Goodwin notified attorney Peter Eglick that the Port planned to begin construction of a third runway at Sea-Tac Airport on or before June 7, 2004, following a Washington State Supreme Court ruling affirming Ecology's Clean Water Act certification. The letter references the case ACC v. Graves (9th Cir. No. 04-35011) and warns opposing counsel of the Port's construction timeline under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-3, which requires advance notice when a party may seek emergency relief within 21 days.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third RunwayFolderRCAA
  • 2001-06-11

    EXH AR1252: ACC Motion for Voluntary Dismissal — Airport Communities Coalition et al. v. FAA and Port Of Seattle, No. 00-70848

    Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Mark C. Rutzick on behalf of petitioners Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), City of Des Moines, City of Normandy Park, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, and Highline School District No. 401 in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 00-70848. Petitioners sought dismissal under
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, ESA, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2000-07-11

    Selected Docket Entries: Airport Communities Coalition v. FAA, Case 00-70848 (9th Cir.)

    This court docket covers a 2000–2001 federal appellate case (No. 00-70848) in which Airport Communities petitioned the Ninth Circuit to review a Federal Aviation Administration decision related to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The petitioner sought a stay pending review, while the Port of Seattle moved to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds, arguing the petition was not filed in time. The court ultimately denied the stay and the motion to dismiss without prejudice, directing all parties to address jurisdictional issues in their merits briefs.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Port Of SeattleFolderCATEX 250 Turn
  • 1998-11-24

    EXH AR000933: City of Normandy Park et al. v. Port Of Seattle and FAA — Ninth Circuit Unpublished Decision

    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unpublished memorandum disposition (165 F.3d 35, 1998 WL 833628) affirming the FAA Administrator’s final approval of the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan expansion project by Port Of Seattle. Petitioners — City of Normandy Park, City of Des Moines, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, Highline School District
    TagsACC, Clean Air Act, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 01
  • 1998-11-24

    EXH AR041830: City of Normandy Park et al. v. Port Of Seattle and Federal Aviation Administration, 165 F.3d 35 (9th Cir. 1998)

    Unpublished Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals memorandum opinion, 165 F.3d 35 (1998 WL 833628), affirming the FAA Administrator’s approval of the Master Plan development project for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Petitioners — City of Normandy Park, City of Des Moines, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, and Highline School District No. 401
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Air Act, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 17

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoice and Approval Correspondence — Sea-Tac Airport SAMP, April 2019" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V