Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCitizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion(47)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-06-10

    EXH AR000917: Notice of Change of Address of Counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160

    Notice of Change of Address filed June 10, 2002 by Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC, attorneys for Respondent Port Of Seattle, in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. New Seattle office address: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 320, Seattle, Washington 98101; Olympia office remains at 421 South Capitol
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-30

    PCHB Doc 1014: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order proposed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Document received May 30, 2002 by the Environmental Hearings Office. Submitted by Helsell
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Redact Testimony of Paul Fendt, P.E.

    Port Of Seattle response filed in PCHB case 01-160 opposing ACC’s (Airport Communities Coalition) motion to redact testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., and strike Exhibit C. Port argues Walker Creek low flow period calculations and Exhibit C were prepared before the February 19, 2002 meeting with Kelly Whiting and before the February 28, 2002
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E.

    Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. (AR 001896-001897), filed in PCHB case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Declarant is a Port Of Seattle consultant addressing the December 2001 Low Flow Plan, Walker Creek low flow period calculations, and meetings with Ecology’s Kelly Whiting on February 12
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-10

    EXH AR001905: Declaration of Rachael Paschal Osborn in Support of ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Declaration by Rachael Paschal Osborn, attorney of record for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB No. 01-160, supporting ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt. Filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Osborn describes cross-examining Fendt on March 27, 2002, requesting redaction of specific sentence and exhibit from
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-09

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order governs admissibility of exhibits numbered 1–2240 following hearing held March 18–29, 2002. Addresses hearsay objections, waived objections, background-only
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-29

    RP Day 10: PCHB No. 01-160 ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port (Mar 29, 2002)

    This document is a transcript from Day Ten (March 29, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Lacey, Washington, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over airport expansion issues. The ten-day hearing, which began March 18, 2002, was presided over by board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and Bill Lynch. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved multiple attorneys representing community groups opposing Sea-Tac Airport expansion and respondents from the state attorney general's office and private firms representing the Port of Seattle.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-28

    RP Day 9: ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 28 2002

    This is a transcript from Day Nine (March 28, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing took place in Lacey, Washington, and involved attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending it.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-28

    Transcript, Day 9: ACC and CASE vs. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160, Day Nine Proceedings

    Transcript of Day Nine proceedings before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), March 28, 2002, Lacey, Washington. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants versus State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents. Board members: Kaleen Cottingham (presiding), Robert Jensen (Board Chair),
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-27

    RP Day 8: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160

    This document is a transcript from Day Eight (March 27, 2002) of a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing was held at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington, before a three-member board. Attorneys representing community groups, the state, and the Port of Seattle all appeared to argue issues related to the airport's environmental and noise impacts on surrounding communities.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Exhibit 119: Email Chain from Kelly Whiting Re: Landscape Management Plans and Metal Rooftop Stormwater Treatment at STIA" — , 2000

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V