Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCASE(182)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR014751: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dyanne Sheldon on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Dyanne Sheldon, environmental scientist and wetland ecologist, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Testimony addresses discrepancies in Ecology’s regulatory authority over wetlands, restoration/creation credits, wetland function assessment, 401 permit conditions,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR015139: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Peter Willing on Behalf of ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Willing holds MS and PhD from Cornell University Department of Natural Resources, specializing in land use and water quality of lakes
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR015220: Pre-Filed Testimony of Greg Wingard on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony declaration of Greg Wingard submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Wingard, Executive Director of Waste Action Project and environmental consultant, details his review of Sea-Tac International Airport NPDES permit #WA-002465-1 discharge
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR013964: Pre-Filed Testimony of Amanda Azous on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Amanda Azous, environmental scientist and professional wetland scientist (Society of Wetland Scientists No. 001067), submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle. Azous reviewed Port of Seattle documentation for Sea-Tac Airport proposed development impacts to wetlands, streams,
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR014137: Pre-Filed Testimony of Edward Kavazanjian, Jr. on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Edward Kavazanjian, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. (GeoSyntec Consultants), submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle. Supports ACC appeal of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, related to construction of a
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony submitted to the Environmental Hearings Office on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) by Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Binder #2 of 4 in a four-binder set. Index references Binder #1
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-20

    PCHB Doc 3518: CASE’s Final List of New Witnesses and Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) final witness and exhibit list filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), dated February 20, 2002, in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Witnesses listed: Kate Rhoads and Bob Furstenberg of King County DNR. Exhibits include construction stormwater monitoring
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-20

    PCHB Doc 003607: Ecology’s Final List of Witnesses and Exhibits — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle)

    Respondent State of Washington Department of Ecology’s final list of witnesses and exhibits filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 11 witnesses including Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Katie Walter
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-20

    EXH AR003636: ACC and CASE’s Response to Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: SEPA

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE response filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issues. Argues Ecology’s CZMA certification concurrence failed to properly assess SEPA compliance given significant new plans including the Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (November 2001), Comprehensive Stormwater Management
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPAFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-19

    PCHB Doc 3705: Letter from Rachael Paschal Osborn to Kaleen Cottingham Re ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160 — Service Dispute on Port’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue

    Letter dated February 19, 2002 from attorney Rachael Paschal Osborn (Spokane) to Kaleen Cottingham, Presiding Officer of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), in ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Osborn disputes timely service of Port of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue filed February 8,
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPAFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 … Page 19
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V