Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCASE(191)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-06

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Third Pre-Hearing Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Third Pre-Hearing Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Issued following a March 6, 2002 pre-hearing conference presided over by Kaleen Cottingham with Board member Bill Lynch and
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003187: Port Of Seattle Joinder in Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475 (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, WAC
  • 2002-03-04

    EXH AR003190: Ecology Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475(7) — ACC Expert Witness Thomas R. Luster, PCHB No. 01-160

    Motion in limine filed March 4, 2002 by State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) seeking to strike pre-filed expert witness testimony of Thomas R. Luster, a former Ecology employee, submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Ecology argues WAC 371-08-475(7) prohibits former Ecology employees from appearing
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-04

    PCHB Doc 002380: Order Denying Motion in Limine Re WAC 371-08-475 — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Denying Motion in Limine in case PCHB 01-160, filed March 4, 2002. Department of Ecology moved to strike pre-filed written direct testimony of Thomas R. Luster submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), citing WAC 371-08-475(7) prohibiting former department employees from appearing as expert witnesses in proceedings where they took
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-28

    EXH AR003194: Erratum to Ecology’s Final List of Witnesses and Exhibits — Exhibit 240 (Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course Photographs)

    Erratum filed by Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Adds omitted Exhibit No. 240 — Photographs of Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course — to Ecology’s Final Witness and Exhibit
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-27

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Patrick C. Lucia on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Patrick C. Lucia, Ph.D., submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 27, 2002. Filed with the Environmental Hearings Office as Supplemental Binder #1 of 1, AR 015511-015513. Case involves Sea-Tac Airport expansion
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-27

    PCHB Doc 3203: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony of Dr. Pat Lucia

    Certificate of Service filed February 27, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery of ACC’s and CASE’s (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witness Dr. Pat Lucia to respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR013964: Pre-Filed Testimony of Amanda Azous on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Amanda Azous, environmental scientist and professional wetland scientist (Society of Wetland Scientists No. 001067), submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle. Azous reviewed Port of Seattle documentation for Sea-Tac Airport proposed development impacts to wetlands, streams,
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR014137: Pre-Filed Testimony of Edward Kavazanjian, Jr. on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Edward Kavazanjian, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. (GeoSyntec Consultants), submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle. Supports ACC appeal of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, related to construction of a
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony submitted to the Environmental Hearings Office on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) by Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Binder #2 of 4 in a four-binder set. Index references Binder #1
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 … Page 20
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "City of Des Moines Economic Development Presentation" — , 2015

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V