Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1084)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-11

    EXH AR006454: Second Declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Second declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in support of motion for stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case nos. 01-133 and 01-160, opposing Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued by Washington Department of Ecology for Port Of Seattle Third Runway embankment at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-10

    EXH AR006410: Declaration of Andrea Grad in Support of ACC’s Opposition to Ecology’s Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    Declaration by Andrea Grad, paralegal at Helsell Fetterman LLP, filed in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Grad attests to her role submitting public disclosure requests to the Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office, Ann Kenny, Sally Perkins) regarding Port of Seattle’s
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-10

    EXH 356: Decl. Dr. Peter Willing Support ACC Sur-Reply Motion Stay

    In this 2001 declaration filed before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, Dr. Peter Willing challenges the Port of Seattle's commitment to improving stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport. He argues that the Port's pledge to retrofit its stormwater system 'to the extent practicable' is vague, undefined, and falls short of required water quality standards. Dr. Willing also contends that the four best management practices listed in the Port's Stormwater Master Plan are largely inadequate, as most do not go beyond basic King County water quality requirements.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006548: Second Declaration of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Second Declaration of James C. Kelley, Ph.D., professional ecologist with Parametrix, Inc., filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Kelley addresses §401 Certification Condition D1g requiring bi-monthly wetland monitoring downslope of the Third Runway embankment fill at
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006567: Declaration of Roger Pearce — §401 Water Quality Certification for STIA Third Runway

    Declaration by Roger Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC representing Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches Exhibit A: Washington Department of Ecology §401 Water Quality Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) issued September 21, 2001, for
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006616: Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-133

    Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould (Risk Assessor, soil scientist, BA geology, MS soil science) filed on behalf of Port Of Seattle opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB No. 01-133. Gould rebuts ACC’s alleged ‘errors’ in the 401 Certification fill criteria for the Third Runway embankment, addressing MTCA Method A cleanup
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006651: Ecology’s Sur-Reply to ACC’s Motion for Stay — Amended 401 Certification, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Department of Ecology sur-reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-133, PCHB No. 01-160) opposing ACC’s motion for a stay of the Amended 401 Certification for the Third Runway embankment project at Sea-Tac Airport. Ecology argues the Amended 401 Certification does not lessen water quality protections under Condition E (acceptable fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-08

    Exhibit 210: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    In a 2001 declaration filed with Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, environmental reviewer Tom Luster argues that the state Department of Ecology's water quality certification for the Sea-Tac Airport expansion was based on speculation rather than the legally required 'reasonable assurance' that water quality standards would be met. Luster contends the certification lacks sufficient evidentiary support and that the approved stormwater and low-flow mitigation plans fall far short of adequately protecting state waters. He warns that accepting this certification approach could set a damaging precedent for future water quality reviews of major projects across Washington State.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH 454: Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Support ACC Motion Stay Section 401 Cert No. 1996-4-02325

    This 2001 declaration from civil and environmental engineer Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed with Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, supports the Airport Communities Coalition's motion to halt construction of a proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Dr. Lucia, a principal with GeoSyntec Consultants, outlines his review of geotechnical and seismic concerns related to the runway's embankment fill and MSE retaining walls. The declaration references multiple technical letters submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising safety and environmental questions about the project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 6948: Declaration of Stephen L. M. Hockaday in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Stephen L. M. Hockaday, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and expert in airport/airspace planning, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Opposes Port Of Seattle construction of Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport pending resolution of
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stephen Hockaday, Third RunwayFolderBox 04

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 … Page 109
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V