• 2002-06-10 19:38

    1996 modeled lead exposure concentrations by state

    Lead - Statewide Source Sector Contribution Estimates For lim1tnuons on the use of !hese data see page 2l 1000 1000 ~--- L~~ ~-- ~~- ~-- ~-­ ~- tJ" - - - - 10::10 1000 Major Area&. Other Onroad Nonroad Background Percent Contribution to Statewide .A.nnual Average Exposure Concentration Estimates Washington, nonroad is the largest contributor for lead NAT Astatbarcharts.doc 6-10-2002 draft For (;) LCIWIIr f l-E!etf'l (1)(J f @- l 1996 Modeled Exposure Concentrations Manganese - Statewide Concentration Distribution Estimates (for limilal!Ons on the use of t11ese data see page 2) ~== r~~~~~m~~~!~~- ~~~~·~~~~su~:~r~~~·~~-~~:J:]:~'I:~:~!!!!I!~~~-~~~::-:rlll·:1:'-r·:~-'~1 Arkansas _ I Calilctnla 25th median 75th : : J : J I] - -T - j Colctado • UpJ* bound c.,..,., ri>k ""'"'""P - - -~- - I Connecticut IWoUmo OXi>O"Uf<f -- -- --~~-- -- --~--~--~ ~ - - - - - DeiiiWllle -- - ~-- TITI r-- ~ ---1-- I Washing';;.;,~ :: J: IIJI F:: _ :: J: ~~: ~ :: l: Georgia ::: 1:: : 1: 1: 1: ::: _ :::1:: --T- Idaho Ill -- -~-- IIIC.ois :::r: TITI r-- -- --- ---r- lndian• TTl r-- ::J: ]JIJ - -T- TITI r-- ---~--Iowa Kansas Kentucky l.ouisi.ana Maine Maryland Michigan Minnesota Minisq,p; MiSS<> uri Montana Nebraska NO'Vilda New HatnpW>ire New .Jersey New Mexico NewYo1k North Ca1olina Nor1h Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode 1&1 and South Ca1 olin a South Dakota Tetlnessee Texas Utah Vermont V1191nia Washington Wesl Virginia Wscon&in Wyoming Pu..rto Rico Vi1gln Islands TITI r-- -TIll r-- :: :1:: T ITI r…
  • 1997-02-06 19:09

    Sea-Tac International Airport Impact Mitigation Study (HOK)

    The Helmuth, Obata Kassabaum study, referred to as ‘HOK’, began as an individual community grant application by the City of Burien. Understandably it became associated with the ACC (plaintiffs in lawsuits attempting to stop the Third Runway) and a response to the defects of the Third Runway EIS. However, this was an independent effort, put
  • 1995-05-01 19:36

    Sea-Tac Airport Pollutant Contribution Dept. Of Ecology 05/91

    The study - done at the re- quest of 33rd District state Rep. Greg Fisher (D-Des Moines) - indicates that the airport accounts for approxi- mately 8 percent of the carbon monoxide ·and 5 percent of the nitrogen oxide in King Coun- ty. Both substances are suspected carcinogens, which means they may cause cancer. "Those who live around the airport live in an air-pollution ~------------v_o_t_~ __ N_o_._12_7 ____ ~IIL ___________________________ A __ 3~ NORTH HILL SOUTH SEATAC NORMANDY PARK ~s a major polluter · hotspot," said Fisher. "It could have significant impacts on their health." POLLUTION GENER· ATED by the airport may be transported by the wind, transformed in the atmosphere and then deposited in sur- rounding areas, the report said. Taken in the aggregate, au- tomobiles still produce far more pollution than any other source, including the airport, said Jim Nolan of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency in Seattle. "But you're going to find that the airport is a great pollution producer, partly because so many vehicles travel there," Nolan said. "But in a lot of respects, au- tomobile traffic is much worse than air traffic." The Boeing plant in Renton, for example, generates 11 tons of carbon monoxide and 45 tons of nitrogen oxide each year, Nolan said. The · airport gel'lerates 3,628 tons of carbon monoxide and 1,897 tons of nitrogen oxide annually, according to the report. Automobiles in King County generate 322,037 tons of carbon monoxide annually, according to statistics from the air-pollution control…
  • 1995-01-28 19:36

    McCulley, Frick & Gilman Final Air Quality Survey for Sea-Tac Airport 1993

    ..... ) Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives & Study Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.0 Sampling Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .…
  • 1973-06-28 19:36

    Environmental Systems Laboratory Air Quality Study Of Sea-Tac Airport 06/73

    Sou=ces . . . . . . . . . . . Carbon Monoxide Chemistry . Effec~s of Carbon Monoxide . . . Hydrocarbons . . . . . Sources . . . . . . . . Hydrocarbon Chemistry . 2ffec~s of Hydrocarbons . Nitrogen Oxides ... so~rces . . . . . . . . Che~ical Interactions of Nitrogen Oxides in t~e A~~OS?here . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of Nitrogen Oxides . . . . Photochemical Oxidants . . . . . . Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of Photochemical Oxidants on Vege~a~ion, Materials, and Animals Pa=ticulate . . . . . . . . . Sou=ces cf:ec~s of Particulate Matter . . . ~~ie~t Air Quality Standards Re:: ere:1ces . . . . . . . • . . . . . EX: ST:~iG AIR QUALITY Topographical and Cli~a~ic Conditions . Meteo=ology . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mixing De?th and Turbulence Classification Near SEA-TAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ar=hival Air Quality . . . . . Meteorological Parameters and Air Pollution Levels A~ SEA-TAC . . . . . . . . Locaticn of &ubient Air Quality Measure~ents Near SE...A.-T.;.c • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . Ex~sting Air Quality-Carbon Monoxide (CO) ... Ex~s~1~g…
  • 1970-10-01 19:36

    Air Pollution By Jet Aircraft at Sea-Tac Airport 1970

    ,_.,. ef ,...Ita -.t ..... 18ft. or IIOf ~ ....,, fGr tan.l ,.llc:lltl• Ill ttle ~ ,..,.I •• Tlle ••• - nM to ~ 01t _.. 111 ,....... _,_ 4Mcrllle ftdllllc:~~t ,. a= f ,,... 1M ,nctlcee, er te ~ te • ll•lte4 .._.,__ -n.. Tacfltllcel .....,. •• wll I ,...,.,... • 1_.1.-tl• ....,.. prl-lly to "'ol-1 ... 1-1 ,...,_of Ill,....., •lilly_ to -twtt-l'egiOit ,..--1, Olt4-- . will 11M lie •l•ly 41tt1"1hte4. n- Ml .... - -~~-·· "'- ...... .,. "-giCifl *••q•• , .... - foil••• ....... , ... tMr ...,._ ... _,. Rig lOll 1111 ,, I t• 10 Att.lltiOII SSO, ... 0. IIIII IIIII, f~l .. llflfll. S.lt LIM City• 11ta11 Ml 11, Tlle ~ "-11011 __., .. et iSSr1l T1rc:Mic:el • I ••• ... ' (,.,11114 •UtiOII,, lit. 10 Olt4 etl ottoer. MtiMII .. wlftl ... 24, - -IIMie 1lto tr. ftle Cl-l,.r-w fGr ,...,..1 SCIMtlflc 1M Tecfll!lcel IM..tiOIII, U. S. O.,b 1-t of ~. Slllt .. lift,., ,_., -.,_, ADM, 5tlf'tl•tfl•l4 0 ~, %2151 • ll'r I eel SJ,OO ...,.r c:GnJ $0,65 •lcntf letlfe, ()roW _., -·- llllllller .,_ I II ,.,._ ,..... .. 1M ef Mdl lll'try. . ... tw-11 "-gl01t Tecfw!ICIII • o IMII •· ,. s-.,.. • ...,....'""' ~tt,.. ~ o. o•- · s.,t ''I ••· -.. J Cllwtologlcet ll'rKI~tlfttiCIIt l'ro!IMII Itt•• aa..11• --, I.IICI- •tttw! O.C. ttl!, •· ' ... ten~ "-910111 ,..._ _. ,_t-f1"-, ,.,..._, ~ o. oc_.. M~t"U '"'· -. 4 UM ef .. ,_,.logical S.telllte Dtte. Mlrctl IM6. -..,..…