Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH 454: Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Support ACC Motion Stay Section 401 Cert No. 1996-4-02325

    This 2001 declaration from civil and environmental engineer Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed with Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, supports the Airport Communities Coalition's motion to halt construction of a proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Dr. Lucia, a principal with GeoSyntec Consultants, outlines his review of geotechnical and seismic concerns related to the runway's embankment fill and MSE retaining walls. The declaration references multiple technical letters submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising safety and environmental questions about the project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007082: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster filed October 8, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, case nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Addresses Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-08

    Exhibit 210: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    In a 2001 declaration filed with Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, environmental reviewer Tom Luster argues that the state Department of Ecology's water quality certification for the Sea-Tac Airport expansion was based on speculation rather than the legally required 'reasonable assurance' that water quality standards would be met. Luster contends the certification lacks sufficient evidentiary support and that the approved stormwater and low-flow mitigation plans fall far short of adequately protecting state waters. He warns that accepting this certification approach could set a damaging precedent for future water quality reviews of major projects across Washington State.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007111: Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor, City of Burien — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor of Burien, filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Nelson supports ACC’s request for a stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification (Department of Ecology Orders No. 1996-4-02325 and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, City of Burien, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007115: Declaration of Robert Olander in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Robert Olander, City Manager of Des Moines, filed in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition’s (ACC) motion for stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006735: ACC’s Motion for Permission to File Overlength Reply Brief — PCHB Nos. 01-133 and 01-160

    Motion filed October 8, 2001 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) via Helsell Fetterman LLP (Kevin L. Stock, WSBA #14541) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), State of Washington, in Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. ACC requests permission to file a 46-page overlength reply brief (exceeding the Board’s 30-page limit by 16 pages) in response
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007119: Declaration of William A. Rozeboom in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of William A. Rozeboom filed October 8, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001. Rozeboom
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-05

    EXH AR023896: Draft Memo — Analytical Results Jan 14 1999 Stormwater Sampling STIA Receiving Streams

    A October 2001 draft memorandum summarizes chemical analysis results from a January 14, 1999 stormwater sampling event at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Water samples were collected from eight receiving stream locations during a storm and tested for metals (copper, lead, and zinc), organic carbon, hardness, and suspended solids. The key finding was that metal concentrations at all sampling sites fell below Washington State hardness-corrected water quality standards (WAC 173-201A-040).
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-05

    EXH AR006520: Port Of Seattle Sur Reply Memorandum — ACC Motion for Stay, PCHB Nos. 01-133 & 01-160

    Port Of Seattle sur reply memorandum filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Addresses ACC’s motion for stay of the amended §401 Certification for STIA, arguing: (1) WAC 173-225-030 requires public notice only for new applications, not amendments;
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-10-05

    EXH AR052146: Draft Memorandum — Summary of Analytical Results from 1-14-99 Storm Water Sampling, STIA Receiving Streams

    Draft memorandum dated October 5, 2001, from Todd Pollard and Linda Logan to Port Of Seattle project files (project number 556-2625-002), summarizing chemical analysis of STIA receiving stream samples collected January 14, 1999 during a storm event with 86-hour antecedent dry period and 1.18 inches of rainfall. Samples collected from 8 locations including SDS-3, Miller
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR004654: Declaration of Jeff Kray — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V