Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007026: Joint Declaration of State Legislators Supporting ACC Stay Request for Sea-Tac Third Runway Section 401 Certification

    Joint declaration filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and No. 01-160 by nine Washington State legislators — Senator Julia Patterson (33rd District), Senator Dow Constantine (34th District), Senator Tracey Eide (30th District), Representatives Shay Schual-Berke, Karen Keiser, Joe McDermott, Erik Poulsen, Mark Miloscia, and Maryann Mitchell — opposing Port Of Seattle’s claim of
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 7332: Stipulation and Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1)

    Stipulation and Order filed October 8, 2001 before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Case Nos. 01-133, 01-150, and 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appealed Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under Order Numbers 1996-4-02325 (August 10, 2001) and amended 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1, September 21,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007036: Declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration by Dr. Patrick Lucia, Principal at GeoSyntec Consultants, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Challenges Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001 (Amended-1), by Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    Declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Dr. Patrick Lucia, a Civil and Environmental Engineer and Principal with GeoSyntec Consultants, provides a declaration in support of the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for stay regarding the Section 401 Certification and CZMA concurrency statement issued for the Sea-Tac Third Runway project. The declaration outlines his qualifications and prior involvement in reviewing geotechnical and seismic
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-08

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster in support of stay

    Tom Luster submits a reply declaration in support of a stay of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology for the Port of Seattle’s proposed airport expansion project. Luster argues the certification is based on speculation rather than the required ‘reasonable assurance’ standard and does not meet applicable
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007082: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster filed October 8, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, case nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Addresses Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007111: Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor, City of Burien — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor of Burien, filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Nelson supports ACC’s request for a stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification (Department of Ecology Orders No. 1996-4-02325 and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, City of Burien, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007115: Declaration of Robert Olander in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Robert Olander, City Manager of Des Moines, filed in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition’s (ACC) motion for stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006735: ACC’s Motion for Permission to File Overlength Reply Brief — PCHB Nos. 01-133 and 01-160

    Motion filed October 8, 2001 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) via Helsell Fetterman LLP (Kevin L. Stock, WSBA #14541) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), State of Washington, in Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. ACC requests permission to file a 46-page overlength reply brief (exceeding the Board’s 30-page limit by 16 pages) in response
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007119: Declaration of William A. Rozeboom in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of William A. Rozeboom filed October 8, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001. Rozeboom
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Flight Corridor Management Program 2026 01 27" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V