Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-09

    PCHB Doc 01-133: Certificate of Service — Port Of Seattle’s Sur-Reply and Supporting Motions, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Certificate of Service filed October 9, 2001 by Julie A. Bunting of Marten Brown Inc. (Olympia, WA) in PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Documents served include Port of Seattle’s Sur-Reply Memorandum, Motion to Shorten Time, Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, Second Declaration
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006649: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Request to File an Overlength Reply Brief

    Department of Ecology response in opposition to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) request to file an overlength reply brief in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, filed October 9, 2001. Ecology, represented by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro (WSBA #19250) and Thomas J. Young (WSBA #17366), joins Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike ACC’s
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006525: Port Of Seattle Motion to Shorten Time — ACC Overlength Brief, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion to shorten time filed October 9, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle requests expedited consideration of its accompanying Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, arguing ACC filed an overlength response memorandum on
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006651: Ecology’s Sur-Reply to ACC’s Motion for Stay — Amended 401 Certification, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Department of Ecology sur-reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-133, PCHB No. 01-160) opposing ACC’s motion for a stay of the Amended 401 Certification for the Third Runway embankment project at Sea-Tac Airport. Ecology argues the Amended 401 Certification does not lessen water quality protections under Condition E (acceptable fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006527: Order Shortening Time — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed Order Shortening Time filed by respondent Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. The Pollution Control Hearings Board, presided by Kaleen Cottingham, grants Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Shorten Time to consider the Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief. Presented
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006655: Second Declaration of Erik Stockdale — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Second Declaration of Erik Stockdale, filed October 9, 2001, in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Stockdale responds to ACC reply brief on motion for stay, asserting hydrologic monitoring has commenced downgradient of the embankment at
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006468: Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents filed by State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology seeks to strike privileged communications inadvertently disclosed to ACC via public disclosure request relating
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006529: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief filed October 9, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle argues ACC filed a 46-page reply memorandum exceeding the Board-ordered 30-page limit by more than 16 pages, violating WAC
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006473: Declaration of Ray Hellwig in Support of Motion to Strike — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration by Ray Hellwig, Regional Director at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, filed October 9, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Hellwig declares that he inadvertently disclosed to ACC, pursuant to a public disclosure request under RCW 42.17.310(1)(i),
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006737: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply memorandum filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion for a stay of Washington Department of Ecology Section 401 Clean Water Act certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001, for Port
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aerial View of Urban Freeway Interchange Near Seattle" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V