Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-04-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Denying ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160 denying Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to redact portions of pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt. ACC argued the testimony violated the February 28, 2002 discovery cut-off order by including discussions and work on the Low Flow Plan conducted between February 12 and February 19, 2002,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-18

    EXH AR001887: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Reply memorandum filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed direct testimony of Port of Seattle expert Paul Fendt regarding Walker Creek low flow frequencies. ACC argues that Fendt’s opinions and the March 2002
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Redact Testimony of Paul Fendt, P.E.

    Port Of Seattle response filed in PCHB case 01-160 opposing ACC’s (Airport Communities Coalition) motion to redact testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., and strike Exhibit C. Port argues Walker Creek low flow period calculations and Exhibit C were prepared before the February 19, 2002 meeting with Kelly Whiting and before the February 28, 2002
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E.

    Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. (AR 001896-001897), filed in PCHB case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Declarant is a Port Of Seattle consultant addressing the December 2001 Low Flow Plan, Walker Creek low flow period calculations, and meetings with Ecology’s Kelly Whiting on February 12
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-11

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Declaration of Peter J. Eglick in Support of ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Declaration by Peter J. Eglick, attorney of record for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed April 11, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Supports ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. (3/7/02). Attaches: (1) excerpt from deposition of Kelly Whiting (February 28,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-11

    PCHB Doc 001898: ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for Washington State, seeking redaction of pre-filed direct testimony of Port of Seattle consulting hydrologist Paul Fendt of Parametrix, Inc. Specifically targets paragraph 42 (p. 11, lines 18-19) stating ’44 of the 47 low flows occurred between August 7
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-10

    EXH AR001905: Declaration of Rachael Paschal Osborn in Support of ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Declaration by Rachael Paschal Osborn, attorney of record for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB No. 01-160, supporting ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt. Filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Osborn describes cross-examining Fendt on March 27, 2002, requesting redaction of specific sentence and exhibit from
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-09

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order governs admissibility of exhibits numbered 1–2240 following hearing held March 18–29, 2002. Addresses hearsay objections, waived objections, background-only
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-04

    PCHB Doc 002039: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed April 4, 2002 by Michael Dennis of Helsell Fetterman LLP on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand delivery on March 14, 2002 of Appellants’ Responses to Ecology/Port Objections and Counter-excerpts of published depositions, and proposed revisions to Outline
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-04

    EXH AR028411: Summary Statement for Deposition Publication — John Drabek, ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Summary Statement for Deposition Publication submitted by ACC and CASE in ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160, pursuant to Order Granting Appellant’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses dated March 19, 2002. Deponent John Drabek, supervisor of the Industrial Permit and
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Pages from King Lysen City Council #7 campaign flyer_0001" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V