TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1531)
-
2002-03-28
RP Day 9: ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 28 2002
This is a transcript from Day Nine (March 28, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing took place in Lacey, Washington, and involved attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending it. -
2002-03-28
PCHB Doc 002047: Revised Direct Testimony of Dave Garland on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160
Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland, hydrogeologist and Watershed Unit supervisor at Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. Garland describes his -
2002-03-28
Transcript, Day 9: ACC and CASE vs. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160, Day Nine Proceedings
Transcript of Day Nine proceedings before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), March 28, 2002, Lacey, Washington. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants versus State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents. Board members: Kaleen Cottingham (presiding), Robert Jensen (Board Chair), -
2002-03-27
RP Day 8: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160
This document is a transcript from Day Eight (March 27, 2002) of a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing was held at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington, before a three-member board. Attorneys representing community groups, the state, and the Port of Seattle all appeared to argue issues related to the airport's environmental and noise impacts on surrounding communities. -
2002-03-26
RP Day 7: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 26 2002
This document is a transcript from Day Seven of a 2002 hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The proceedings, held in Lacey, Washington from March 26–29, 2002, involved attorneys representing community groups, state environmental regulators, and the Port of Seattle. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) reflects community opposition to the airport's expansion and related environmental and noise concerns. -
2002-03-26
EXH AR002044: Offer of Proof Re: Excluded Statements from Dave Garland’s Testimony — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle
Offer of proof filed by Washington Attorney General Thomas J. Young on behalf of the Department of Ecology, dated March 26, 2002, memorializing excluded statements from Dave Garland’s direct testimony in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). The excluded -
2002-03-25
RP Day 6: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port — PCHB No. 01-160, March 25, 2002
This document is a transcript from Day Six (March 25, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing, held in Lacey, Washington, featured attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending their positions. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) was part of a broader legal effort by neighboring communities to scrutinize the environmental impacts of the airport's growth. -
2002-03-22
RP Day 5: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160
This is a transcript from Day Five (March 22, 2002) of a ten-day administrative hearing held before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board in Lacey, Washington. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenging the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Attorneys representing all four parties appeared before a three-member board chaired by Robert V. Jensen. -
2002-03-22
PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Strike Certain Pre-Filed Testimony and Limit Oral Testimony
Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 22, 2002, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to strike certain pre-filed testimony and limit oral testimony. Board presided by Kaleen Cottingham established February 28, 2002 as discovery cut-off date; parties prohibited from relying on information created after that date. Order restricts Port of Seattle -
2002-03-21
RP Day 4: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port, PCHB No. 01-160 (Mar 21, 2002)
This is a transcript from Day Four (March 21, 2002) of a hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The ten-day hearing, held in Lacey, Washington, brought together attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion alongside state and port officials. The case, identified as PCHB No. 01-160, reflects community concerns about the environmental and noise impacts of the proposed airport expansion.