Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-28

    RP Day 9: ACC & CASE vs. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 28 2002

    This is a transcript from Day Nine (March 28, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing took place in Lacey, Washington, and involved attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending it.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-28

    PCHB Doc 002047: Revised Direct Testimony of Dave Garland on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160

    Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland, hydrogeologist and Watershed Unit supervisor at Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. Garland describes his
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-28

    Transcript, Day 9: ACC and CASE vs. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160, Day Nine Proceedings

    Transcript of Day Nine proceedings before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160), March 28, 2002, Lacey, Washington. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants versus State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents. Board members: Kaleen Cottingham (presiding), Robert Jensen (Board Chair),
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderOther
  • 2002-03-27

    RP Day 8: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160

    This document is a transcript from Day Eight (March 27, 2002) of a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing was held at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington, before a three-member board. Attorneys representing community groups, the state, and the Port of Seattle all appeared to argue issues related to the airport's environmental and noise impacts on surrounding communities.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-26

    RP Day 7: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 26 2002

    This document is a transcript from Day Seven of a 2002 hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The proceedings, held in Lacey, Washington from March 26–29, 2002, involved attorneys representing community groups, state environmental regulators, and the Port of Seattle. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) reflects community opposition to the airport's expansion and related environmental and noise concerns.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-26

    EXH AR002044: Offer of Proof Re: Excluded Statements from Dave Garland’s Testimony — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Offer of proof filed by Washington Attorney General Thomas J. Young on behalf of the Department of Ecology, dated March 26, 2002, memorializing excluded statements from Dave Garland’s direct testimony in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). The excluded
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-25

    RP Day 6: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port — PCHB No. 01-160, March 25, 2002

    This document is a transcript from Day Six (March 25, 2002) of a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing, held in Lacey, Washington, featured attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion as well as state and port officials defending their positions. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) was part of a broader legal effort by neighboring communities to scrutinize the environmental impacts of the airport's growth.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-22

    RP Day 5: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160

    This is a transcript from Day Five (March 22, 2002) of a ten-day administrative hearing held before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board in Lacey, Washington. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenging the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Attorneys representing all four parties appeared before a three-member board chaired by Robert V. Jensen.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Strike Certain Pre-Filed Testimony and Limit Oral Testimony

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 22, 2002, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to strike certain pre-filed testimony and limit oral testimony. Board presided by Kaleen Cottingham established February 28, 2002 as discovery cut-off date; parties prohibited from relying on information created after that date. Order restricts Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-21

    RP Day 4: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port, PCHB No. 01-160 (Mar 21, 2002)

    This is a transcript from Day Four (March 21, 2002) of a hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The ten-day hearing, held in Lacey, Washington, brought together attorneys representing community groups opposed to the expansion alongside state and port officials. The case, identified as PCHB No. 01-160, reflects community concerns about the environmental and noise impacts of the proposed airport expansion.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 24

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Boeing Field/King County International Airport (BFI) airport profile" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V