TagClean Water Act(243)

Direct testimony of Ann Kenny, Environmental Planner 4 at Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office (NWRO), submitted on behalf of Ecology in PCHB No. 01-160. Proceeding before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, with Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants against Ecology and Port Of

Direct testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager of the Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Section, Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case No. 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) are appellants; State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle are

Pre-filed testimony of Sally Nelson, Burien City Council member and former Mayor, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port Of Seattle. Testimony introduces ACC — an interlocal agreement entity comprising Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila,

Department of Ecology (Ecology) petition for review of agency action filed in Thurston County Superior Court (Case No. 02-2-01595-3) on September 18, 2002, against the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), with Port Of Seattle as respondent below. Ecology challenges a PCHB decision involving a Clean

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition, composed of Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and Highline School District) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) petition for judicial review filed in Thurston County Superior Court under Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW. Challenges PCHB No. 01-160 final Order of August 12, 2002 (finalized September

Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in King County Superior Court (case no. 02-2-25658-9SEA) under RCW 34.05 (Administrative Procedure Act), challenging the August 12, 2002 final order of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160) regarding the 401 Certification issued by Washington Department of Ecology on September 21, 2001 for the

Fax dated 8/20/02 from Sandra Manning (Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program) to Tom Young transmitting a signed stormwater agreement. Includes WQP Policy 1-22 (effective July 15, 2001), titled ‘Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts for the Water Quality

This document chronicles the Port of Seattle's second Section 401 Clean Water Act permit application, submitted in September 1999, which was on the verge of being denied by the Washington State Department of Ecology due to multiple shortcomings related to wetlands and water quality. On September 28, 2000, a private, unannounced meeting was held between Port, Ecology, and Governor's office officials, after which the Port strategically withdrew its application to avoid a formal denial. A series of closed-door negotiating sessions followed in October 2000, none of which were publicly announced, raising concerns about political influence and lack of transparency in the permitting process for Sea-Tac Airport expansion.

Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle in PCHB Case No. 01-160, received May 22, 2002. Document addresses appeal by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) of the §401 Clean Water Act Certification (33 U.S.C. §1341) issued by Ecology

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, hearing held March 18-29, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appellant and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) intervenor versus Washington State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle respondents. Document presents proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order regarding Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for