Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(246)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR021398: Declaration John A. Strand PhD Support CASE Appeal Stay NPDES Major Modification PCHB 01-090

    In this 2001 declaration filed with Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, fisheries biologist Dr. John A. Strand argues that proposed modifications to the Port of Seattle's stormwater discharge permit would harm Walker and Gilliam Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport, which support salmon, trout, and other aquatic life. Dr. Strand contends that Ecology failed to identify specific locations of new construction-related stormwater outfalls, denying the public a meaningful chance to assess environmental impacts. He supports a stay of the permit modification until its compliance with the Clean Water Act can be fully reviewed.
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015633: Direct Testimony of Ann Kenny on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Ann Kenny, Environmental Planner 4 at Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office (NWRO), submitted on behalf of Ecology in PCHB No. 01-160. Proceeding before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, with Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants against Ecology and Port Of
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015589: Direct Testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager of the Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Section, Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case No. 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) are appellants; State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle are
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR014581: Pre-Filed Testimony of Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Sally Nelson, Burien City Council member and former Mayor, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port Of Seattle. Testimony introduces ACC — an interlocal agreement entity comprising Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-18

    PCHB Doc 181: Ecology Petition for Review of Agency Action — State of Washington, Dep’t of Ecology v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, et al.

    Department of Ecology (Ecology) petition for review of agency action filed in Thurston County Superior Court (Case No. 02-2-01595-3) on September 18, 2002, against the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), with Port Of Seattle as respondent below. Ecology challenges a PCHB decision involving a Clean
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-12

    EXH AR000375: ACC and CASE Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition, composed of Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and Highline School District) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) petition for judicial review filed in Thurston County Superior Court under Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW. Challenges PCHB No. 01-160 final Order of August 12, 2002 (finalized September
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-06

    PCHB Doc 561: Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in King County Superior Court (case no. 02-2-25658-9SEA) under RCW 34.05 (Administrative Procedure Act), challenging the August 12, 2002 final order of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160) regarding the 401 Certification issued by Washington Department of Ecology on September 21, 2001 for the
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-20

    EXH AR033654: Fax Cover Sheet and WQP Policy 1-22 — Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts

    Fax dated 8/20/02 from Sandra Manning (Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program) to Tom Young transmitting a signed stormwater agreement. Includes WQP Policy 1-22 (effective July 15, 2001), titled ‘Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts for the Water Quality
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, WAC, Water Quality
  • 2002-08-12

    Chronology of Section 401 permit, second application

    This document chronicles the Port of Seattle's second Section 401 Clean Water Act permit application, submitted in September 1999, which was on the verge of being denied by the Washington State Department of Ecology due to multiple shortcomings related to wetlands and water quality. On September 28, 2000, a private, unannounced meeting was held between Port, Ecology, and Governor's office officials, after which the Port strategically withdrew its application to avoid a formal denial. A series of closed-door negotiating sessions followed in October 2000, none of which were publicly announced, raising concerns about political influence and lack of transparency in the permitting process for Sea-Tac Airport expansion.
    TagsClean Water Act, Ecology, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Stormwater
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law — Ecology and Port Of Seattle v. ACC and CASE

    Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle in PCHB Case No. 01-160, received May 22, 2002. Document addresses appeal by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) of the §401 Clean Water Act Certification (33 U.S.C. §1341) issued by Ecology
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2019 Worst Year for Air Freight Demand Since 2009" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V