TagCASE(10)

Port of Seattle tlinted at plans to add a third in the runway Fall of 198/ at Sea–Tac , TIle citizens’ reactions to such a flawed option for expansion was a resounding "NC3 ! " This was e>tpressed in a SOO–person turnout to a public hearing and an immediate petition bearing over 46QO signatures of protest put on file with tIle Port of Seattle Commission a Based on thi sP the King County Council passed a resolution against a third runway , Our large number of continuously growing supporters and a committee have been engaged in a pngoi ng effort dedicated that alternatives to Sea–Tac expansion are wiser economic choices, 12–member steering to demonstrating and environmental Our function is to in form State and Federal decisionmakers, the Business–at–large of these Alternative Choices both through our and a concise 2D–minute view foil/commentary presentations which Group has made available, Public and supporters our Technical Our steering committee is comprised mainly of retired multi –disciplined professionals who dedicate their time and efforts completely voluntarily various Task Groups and to guiding the efforts of the alan)' volunteers, to We work similar in concert bent , such with many other state and regional organizations of as the Seattle Community Council Federation , etc a More organizational detai I is available on request , CASE Group Pa On Box 48171 . Seattle , WA 98166–017 1 Phone : 242 –6112 Chairman : David F, Smith / '?a /' THIRD R(INWOY IT’s TIME TO TriKE O STOnDdro…

PORT OF SEATTLE, a port district of the State of Washington, NO. 02-2-25658-9 SEA Petitioner, DECLARATION OF KEVIN L. STOCK IN v. RESPONSE TO PORT OF SEATTLE'S APPLICATION FOR DIRECT REVIEW THE POLLUTION CONTROL HEARINGS

March 18-29, 2002. The Board was comprised of Kaleen Cottingham, presiding, Robert V. Jensen, and William H. Lynch. The Appellant, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), and Intervenor, Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE), challenge the Port of Seattle‘s (Port)

To: Mr. Frederick C. Stouder, City Manager City of Burien 415 SW 150th St. Burien WA 98166-1973 Subject: Draft prepared by South King County Impact Assistance and Mitigation Studies Team (Enclosed in your October 21, 1996 letter to City Council) Please forward this to South King County Impact Assistance and Mitigation Studies Team. As an engineering manager, I appreciate how constrained the team's task is by budget and schedule so please take these comments as a desire to help. Having spent over 1000 hours studying the Environmental Impact Statements, regulations, and related text books, I hope there is time to consider my comments. I apologize being so late but I was unaware of your Open Houses until the last one that Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) called me about. No copies of the report were available that night. Please contact me if you would like any data or information. As an aerospace manager, it would be inappropriate for me to take your calls at my office. You may leave a message at my home and I will return your call. If you call between AM and 8 AM you will probably find me at home. Sincerely, CL~0 A. Brown 239 SW 189 PI Seattle, WA 98166 (206) 431-8693 Enclosures: Enclosure 1 : Comments on Draft Study Enclosure 2 : Normandy Park Real Estate Data Summary Enclosure 3 : Normandy Park Third Quarter 1996 real estate data Enclosure 4 : Current and Planned Haul Truck Mitigation Enclosure 5 : References and…

A technical review document from Debi DesMarais providing comments on a draft mitigation cost analysis for the City of Burien Impact Assistance Team. The review covers social impacts, property values, noise data, and various technical aspects of airport-related community impacts.

Subject: Appeal of Port's Resolution No. 3212, Commonly Referred to as the "Third Runway" Vote, Thursday, August 1,1996 References: Enclosure 4 This is an appeal of Resolution No. 3212 regarding your Thursday, August 1, 1996, vote "adopting the Master Plan Update for Seattle-Tac International Airport, approving development of a new dependent air carrier runway (commonly referred to as the "third runway") ... "(ref. (tt)) . It is requested the Port reverse that decision. Instead, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (ref. (d)) that examines other alternatives is requested. These alternatives should include technology such as Localizer Directional Aid (LOA) and Global Positioning Satellites (GPS). These technology options should be examined both with and without demand management because Sea-Tac's load factor is less than 30• (PSRC Correspondence package). With Demand management aimed at penalizing carriers with less than 20 passengers combined with technology, the capaCity of Sea-Tac would be GREATER than the maximum in the existing 1996 FEIS (ref. (d)). In addition, alternative sites should be reevaluated. The Port should take advantage of the long delays that occurred to "approve" the Third Runway. During that period, technology has matured so much that the Third Runway is no longer needed. Washington actually saved money by spending well over$ 4 million on studies PROVIDED we change direction NOW and go down the cheaper, new technology path instead. .. r · .. '· The Port needs to consider the Air Transport Authority's March 20,1996 statement (ref. (rr)):…