Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(279)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006529: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief filed October 9, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle argues ACC filed a 46-page reply memorandum exceeding the Board-ordered 30-page limit by more than 16 pages, violating WAC
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006567: Declaration of Roger Pearce — §401 Water Quality Certification for STIA Third Runway

    Declaration by Roger Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC representing Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches Exhibit A: Washington Department of Ecology §401 Water Quality Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) issued September 21, 2001, for
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006645: Certificate of Service — Port Of Seattle Sur Reply, Motions, and Declarations in ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed by Wendy S. Clement of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC on October 9, 2001 in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Documents served include: Port of Seattle’s Sur Reply Memorandum, Motion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    PCHB Doc 01-133: Certificate of Service — Port Of Seattle’s Sur-Reply and Supporting Motions, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Certificate of Service filed October 9, 2001 by Julie A. Bunting of Marten Brown Inc. (Olympia, WA) in PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Documents served include Port of Seattle’s Sur-Reply Memorandum, Motion to Shorten Time, Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, Second Declaration
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006525: Port Of Seattle Motion to Shorten Time — ACC Overlength Brief, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion to shorten time filed October 9, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle requests expedited consideration of its accompanying Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, arguing ACC filed an overlength response memorandum on
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH 454: Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Support ACC Motion Stay Section 401 Cert No. 1996-4-02325

    This 2001 declaration from civil and environmental engineer Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed with Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, supports the Airport Communities Coalition's motion to halt construction of a proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Dr. Lucia, a principal with GeoSyntec Consultants, outlines his review of geotechnical and seismic concerns related to the runway's embankment fill and MSE retaining walls. The declaration references multiple technical letters submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising safety and environmental questions about the project.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007026: Joint Declaration of State Legislators Supporting ACC Stay Request for Sea-Tac Third Runway Section 401 Certification

    Joint declaration filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and No. 01-160 by nine Washington State legislators — Senator Julia Patterson (33rd District), Senator Dow Constantine (34th District), Senator Tracey Eide (30th District), Representatives Shay Schual-Berke, Karen Keiser, Joe McDermott, Erik Poulsen, Mark Miloscia, and Maryann Mitchell — opposing Port Of Seattle’s claim of
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007082: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster filed October 8, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, case nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Addresses Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007111: Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor, City of Burien — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor of Burien, filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Nelson supports ACC’s request for a stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification (Department of Ecology Orders No. 1996-4-02325 and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, City of Burien, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 7332: Stipulation and Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1)

    Stipulation and Order filed October 8, 2001 before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Case Nos. 01-133, 01-150, and 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appealed Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under Order Numbers 1996-4-02325 (August 10, 2001) and amended 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1, September 21,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 … Page 28
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V