Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(279)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-09-25

    EXH AR012942: Declaration of James L. Morasch in Support of Port Of Seattle Third Runway, PCHB 01-133

    Declaration of James L. Morasch, Director of Airports for the Port of Pasco, filed in PCHB case No. 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle). Morasch supports the new all-weather third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac). States Sea-Tac is the #1 destination for Tri-Cities Airport passengers, accounting for 47%
    TagsAAAE, ACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 06
  • 2001-09-25

    EXH AR012945: Declaration of Alan C. Ralston in Support of Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Declaration of Alan C. Ralston, Director of Northwest State and Local Government Relations for The Boeing Company, filed in PCHB Case No. 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Ralston declares Boeing’s support for expeditious construction of the Third
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Boeing, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 06
  • 2001-09-21

    EXH AR012548: Declaration of C. Linn Gould in Support of Port Of Seattle’s Response Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of C. Linn Gould (Risk Assessor, soil scientist, MS soil science, BA geology) filed in PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Gould supports Port Of Seattle’s opposition to ACC’s motion for stay of the Third Runway 401 Certification issued September 21, 2001. Declaration
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 06
  • 2001-09-21

    EXH AR023881: ACC Notice of Appeal Reissued/Amended §401 Certification (Ecology Order 1996-4-02325 Amended-1)

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appealed an amended Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification issued by the Washington Department of Ecology on September 21, 2001, related to construction and expansion work at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. ACC argued that the amended certification weakened already inadequate water quality protections by limiting its scope, reducing wetland monitoring requirements, loosening fill acceptance standards, and bypassing required public notice and comment procedures. The appeal contended that these changes failed to provide reasonable assurance that the airport project would not violate state and federal water quality standards.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 10
  • 2001-09-21

    PCHB Doc 007768: Agreement and Order Re Rescission of 401 Certification — Port Of Seattle and ACC v. Ecology

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Agreement and Order Re Rescission of 401 Certification, PCHB No. 01-150 and No. 01-133, involving Port Of Seattle and Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) as appellants against Washington State Department of Ecology. Ecology Order No. 1996-4-02325 issued August 10, 2001 included a Section 401 Clean Water Act water quality certification and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-13

    EXH AR007782: ACC’s Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for a Stay — Section 401 Permit No. 1996-4-02325

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition, comprising Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and Highline School District) files memorandum before Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-133, seeking a stay of Department of Ecology Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 issued August 10, 2001 for the Sea-Tac Third Runway and related projects.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-12

    EXH AR008048: Declaration of Dr. Peter Willing in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Declaration by Dr. Peter Willing, Principal of Water Resources Consulting LLC (Bellingham), filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports ACC’s motion for stay of Ecology’s Section 401 Water Quality Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-12

    PCHB Doc 008218: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, No. 01-133

    Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster, former senior policy and technical expert at Ecology’s Federal Permits Unit (1989–2001), provides expert testimony on CWA Section 401 water quality certification No. 1996-4-02325 and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-12

    EXH AR008249: ACC Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA Concurrency Statement, Third Runway, PCHB No. 01-133

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay filed with the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-133, seeking to stay Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and accompanying CZMA concurrency statement issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to Port Of Seattle on August 10, 2001, related to construction of a Third Runway and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-09-12

    Exhibit 209: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133

    Thomas R. Luster, a former 12-year Department of Ecology expert in water quality and wetlands, submitted this declaration to Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board challenging the water quality certification issued for construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Luster, who served as Ecology's senior policy and technical expert for Clean Water Act Section 401 reviews and had personally overseen more than 700 such certifications, was asked to assess whether the project and its certification complied with federal and state water quality standards. His testimony was submitted in support of a request to stay the certification issued on August 10, 2001.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 … Page 28
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V