September 12, 2001August 2, 2026

EXH AR008249: ACC Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA Concurrency Statement, Third Runway, PCHB No. 01-133

Notes

Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay filed with the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-133, seeking to stay Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and accompanying CZMA concurrency statement issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to Port Of Seattle on August 10, 2001, related to construction of a Third Runway and related projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Motion supported by declarations of Peter J. Eglick, Thomas R. Luster, William A. Rozeboom, Dr. Peter Willing, Dr. John A. Strand, Amanda L. Azous, and Kevin L. Stock. Proposed order includes signatures of Roger A. Pearce, Steven G. Jones, Linda J. Strout, Traci M. Goodman, Jay J. Manning, Gille E. Reavis, Joan Marchioro, Thomas J. Young. Attorneys Rachael Paschal Osborn and Helsell Fetterman LLP represent appellant.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message