TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Declaration by Andrea Grad, paralegal at Helsell Fetterman LLP, filed in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Grad attests to her role submitting public disclosure requests to the Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office, Ann Kenny, Sally Perkins) regarding Port of Seattle’s

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) reply brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, opposing Ecology and Port of Seattle objections to ACC’s motion to file an overlength reply brief. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001 as No.

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160, signed by Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham on October 10, 2001. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion requesting permission to file an overlength reply brief simultaneously with the filing of the lengthy reply itself, in violation of an earlier order and stipulation. The Board reluctantly

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order on Motion to Strike in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology moved to strike references to an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by NW Regional Director Ray Hellwig for a senior management team meeting in April

Declaration by Dr. Peter Willing (Ph.D.) filed October 10, 2001, in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) sur-reply on motion for stay before the Washington Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Challenges Port Of Seattle’s Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement (issued August 10, 2001, reissued September

In this 2001 declaration filed before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, Dr. Peter Willing challenges the Port of Seattle's commitment to improving stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport. He argues that the Port's pledge to retrofit its stormwater system 'to the extent practicable' is vague, undefined, and falls short of required water quality standards. Dr. Willing also contends that the four best management practices listed in the Port's Stormwater Master Plan are largely inadequate, as most do not go beyond basic King County water quality requirements.

Respondent Washington State Department of Ecology statement of issues, preliminary witness list, and exhibit list filed in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. The central issue is whether Ecology had reasonable assurance that water quality standards would be met when issuing a Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification

Declaration by Roger Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC representing Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches Exhibit A: Washington Department of Ecology §401 Water Quality Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) issued September 21, 2001, for

Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould (Risk Assessor, soil scientist, BA geology, MS soil science) filed on behalf of Port Of Seattle opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB No. 01-133. Gould rebuts ACC’s alleged ‘errors’ in the 401 Certification fill criteria for the Third Runway embankment, addressing MTCA Method A cleanup

Certificate of Service filed by Wendy S. Clement of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC on October 9, 2001 in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Documents served include: Port of Seattle’s Sur Reply Memorandum, Motion