TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) reply memorandum in support of its motion for a stay, filed October 10, 2001, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). Argues that the Amended Certification sets acceptable soil contamination levels too high to protect water quality, citing DOE expert Chung Yee’s 3-phase back-calculating model showing Antimony should be limited to

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160, signed by Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham on October 10, 2001. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion requesting permission to file an overlength reply brief simultaneously with the filing of the lengthy reply itself, in violation of an earlier order and stipulation. The Board reluctantly

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order on Motion to Strike in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology moved to strike references to an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by NW Regional Director Ray Hellwig for a senior management team meeting in April

Declaration by Dr. Peter Willing (Ph.D.) filed October 10, 2001, in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) sur-reply on motion for stay before the Washington Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Challenges Port Of Seattle’s Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement (issued August 10, 2001, reissued September

In this 2001 declaration filed before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, Dr. Peter Willing challenges the Port of Seattle's commitment to improving stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport. He argues that the Port's pledge to retrofit its stormwater system 'to the extent practicable' is vague, undefined, and falls short of required water quality standards. Dr. Willing also contends that the four best management practices listed in the Port's Stormwater Master Plan are largely inadequate, as most do not go beyond basic King County water quality requirements.

Second Declaration of James C. Kelley, Ph.D., professional ecologist with Parametrix, Inc., filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Kelley addresses §401 Certification Condition D1g requiring bi-monthly wetland monitoring downslope of the Third Runway embankment fill at

Second Declaration of Paul S. Fendt (Parametrix, Inc.) filed October 9, 2001 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Fendt addresses ACC claims regarding Port control over stormwater retrofit schedule at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) for the Master Plan Update (MPU). Covers Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

Declaration by Roger Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC representing Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches Exhibit A: Washington Department of Ecology §401 Water Quality Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) issued September 21, 2001, for

Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould (Risk Assessor, soil scientist, BA geology, MS soil science) filed on behalf of Port Of Seattle opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB No. 01-133. Gould rebuts ACC’s alleged ‘errors’ in the 401 Certification fill criteria for the Third Runway embankment, addressing MTCA Method A cleanup

Certificate of Service filed by Wendy S. Clement of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC on October 9, 2001 in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Documents served include: Port of Seattle’s Sur Reply Memorandum, Motion