Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise Abatement Procedures(103)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • Port of seattle 1984 07 09 noise abatement procedures letter united airlines pdf
    1984-07-09

    Port Of Seattle Letter to United Airlines on Sea-Tac Airport Noise Abatement Procedures

    July 9, 1984 letter from Port Of Seattle to Captain M. E. Volz, Vice President of Flight Safety and Industry Affairs at United Airlines, summarizing noise abatement procedures at Sea-Tac International Airport. Covers FAA SEA TWR 7110.071C (10/7/80) noise abatement procedures, Standard Instrument Departure (SIDs) using Seattle VOR 158 radial for south flow and VOR
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsANCA, FAA, Noise Abatement Procedures, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, United Airlines
  • 1984-06-22

    Letter from United Airlines to Mr. Vernon L. Ljungren, Seattle-Tacoma Int’l Airport, Regarding Noise Abatement Procedures Survey

    In a June 22, 1984 letter to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, United Airlines Vice President Captain M. E. Volz requested information about the airport's noise-sensitive areas and any formal or informal noise abatement procedures in place. The airline was conducting a survey of all airports it served in order to build a computer database of noise procedures accessible to pilots at any United Airlines terminal. United Airlines asked Sea-Tac to provide copies or descriptions of its noise procedures and to send future updates to the Flight Safety Department in Chicago.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsNoise, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac Airport, seatac, United Airlines
  • United airlines 1984 06 22 noise abatement survey ljungren sea tac pdf
    1984-06-22

    Letter from United Airlines to Mr. Vernon L. Ljungren, Seattle-Tacoma Int’l Airport, Regarding Noise Abatement Procedures Survey

    Letter dated June 22, 1984 from Captain M. E. Volz, Vice President of Flight Safety & Industry Affairs at United Airlines (P.O. Box 66100, Chicago, IL 60666), to Mr. Vernon L. Ljungren at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Box 68727, Seattle, WA 98158). United Airlines surveys airports it serves regarding sensitive noise areas and formal or informal
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsNoise, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac Airport, seatac, United Airlines
  • 1984-01-12

    Airport Noise Remedy Update – Meeting Notice and Working Paper Distribution

    A January 1984 Port of Seattle memorandum notifies the Technical Working Committee of an upcoming meeting on January 25 to review noise remedy programs for Jackson (Sea-Tac) International Airport, including land acquisition, purchase assurance, and sound insulation proposals. Attached is a draft chapter evaluating on-airport and off-airport noise abatement measures against ten criteria, such as airspace compatibility and aircraft safety. The document outlines which measures were recommended for implementation following an initial screening process described in an earlier chapter.
    CategoriesMeetings Tagsairport issues, Henry M. Jackson International AIrport, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Update, Port Of Seattle
  • 1983-12-28

    Aeronautical study 83-ANM-181-NR synopsis: Noise abatement procedures at Henry M. Jackson International Airport

    In December 1983, the FAA completed an aeronautical study of a proposal by the Port of Seattle to eliminate the 'right-turn' departure route for eastbound turbojet aircraft leaving Sea-Tac Airport (Runway 34) during daytime hours. The study found that removing this route would simply shift aircraft noise to other communities, increase airline operating costs by an estimated $1.5 million annually, and raise fuel consumption, without providing a net noise reduction benefit. As a result, the Port of Seattle withdrew its proposal and the FAA declined to eliminate the existing noise abatement route.
    TagsFAA, Henry M. Jackson International AIrport, Noise Abatement Procedures, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1983-08-05

    Noise control and compatibility planning for airports

    This 1983 FAA Advisory Circular (AC 150/5020-1) provides guidance for airports on noise control and land-use compatibility planning under FAR Part 150 and the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. It outlines a standardized system for measuring airport noise, identifying compatible and incompatible land uses near airports, and developing Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Programs. Participation in the program is voluntary, and it aims to reduce existing noise conflicts around airports while preventing new incompatible development through cooperation among airport operators, planners, and community members.
    TagsASNA, FAA, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Part 150
  • 1983-08-05

    Noise control and compatibility planning for airports

    This 1983 FAA Advisory Circular (AC 150/5020-1) provides guidance for airports on noise control and land-use compatibility planning under FAR Part 150 and the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. It outlines a standardized system for measuring airport noise, identifying compatible and incompatible land uses near airports, and developing Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Programs. Participation in the program is voluntary, and it aims to reduce existing noise conflicts around airports while preventing new incompatible development through cooperation among airport operators, planners, and community members.
    TagsASNA, FAA, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Part 150
  • 1980-10-07

    SEA TWR 7110.071C: Noise Abatement Procedures, Seattle-Tacoma Tower

    This 1980 Federal Aviation Administration order establishes noise abatement procedures for aircraft operating to and from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and Boeing Field. It directs turbojet aircraft to fly over Puget Sound and Elliott Bay whenever possible, sets altitude and distance restrictions before aircraft can turn toward populated shoreline areas, and defines preferred takeoff and landing runways to minimize noise impact. The procedures apply to both VFR and IFR turbojet flights, with stricter nighttime rules between 2200 and 0600 local time.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, Boeing Field, FAA, Four Post Plan, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac Airport
  • FAA sea twr 7110 071c noise abatement procedures 1980 10 07 pdf
    1980-10-07

    SEA TWR 7110.071C: Noise Abatement Procedures, Seattle-Tacoma Tower

    FAA order SEA TWR 7110.071C dated October 7, 1980, issued by Seattle-Tacoma Tower (Seattle, Washington), prescribing noise abatement procedures for turbojet aircraft operating to and from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and Boeing Field (BFI). Cancels prior order SEA TWR 7110.071B dated July 25, 1973. Covers north flow and south flow departure routing over Elliott Bay and
    TagsAir Traffic Control, Boeing Field, FAA, Four Post Plan, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1979-11-01

    Airport Noise Control Procedure Manual

    This 1979 Airport Noise Control Procedure Manual, approved by Oregon's Department of Environmental Quality, outlines the procedural steps required for compliance with noise control regulations for airports (OAR 340-35-045). It describes how the Department calculates Noise Impact Boundaries for non-air-carrier airports, including the flight operational data and mapping information needed to make accurate assessments. The manual was issued under the authority of ORS Chapter 467 and was designed to minimize the administrative burden on smaller airport facilities.
    TagsAirport Noise Law, Airports, Manual, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Boundary

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Preliminary Assessment of Airspace Interactions: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and King County International Airport" — , 1982

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V