Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEarthquake(16)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-14

    Beware – The Great Wall of Sea-Tac and Coalition appeals permit for 3rd runway

    Two 2001 Seattle Post-Intelligencer articles raise safety and environmental concerns about SeaTac Airport's proposed third runway. The first warns that a planned 15-story, 1,450-foot retaining wall built on weak, earthquake-prone soils could catastrophically fail in a seismic event, threatening wetlands and salmon-bearing streams. The second reveals that state officials approved a key water-quality permit for the runway without following their own attorney's advice to secure a water right, prompting the Airport Communities Coalition to appeal the permit and allege political pressure was driving the project forward.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Earthquake, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-03-05

    EXH AR049946: Revised Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum dated March 5, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist E.I.T., Barry Chen PhD P.E., and Michael Bailey P.E. of Hart Crowser Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. of HNTB, project J-4978-30. Presents revised methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the SeaTac Third Runway embankment, based on revised probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and one-dimensional site
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049834: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Additional Information on the Seismic Design for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway

    Memorandum dated January 25, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist (EIT) and Michael Bailey (P.E.) of Hart Crowser, Inc. to the Embankment Technical Review Board (Attn: Pete Douglass), project J-4978-30, CC to Jim Thomson (P.E., HNTB). Provides additional information on seismic analyses for the Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) in SeaTac, Washington. Covers probabilistic seismic
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2000-09-07

    EXH AR046005: Draft Memorandum — Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum J-4978-28 from Hart Crowser (Douglas Lindquist, Barry Chen PhD P.E., Michael Bailey P.E.) to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB, dated September 7, 2000, presenting methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the proposed Third Runway embankment and retaining walls at Sea-Tac, Washington. Analyzed 120 borings with Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results from 112
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway
  • 2000-04-10

    EXH AR044372: Seismic Basis of Design — Third Runway Project (Hart Crowser Draft Memo to HNTB)

    Draft memorandum dated April 10, 2000 from Douglas Lindquist, Barry Chen P.E., and Mike Bailey P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB regarding seismic basis of design for the Third Runway Project (J-4978-14) at Sea-Tac Airport for the Port of Seattle. Compares 475-year return period (0.36g peak acceleration, 10% probability of
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 1999-10-08

    EXH AR043079: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Results

    Hart Crowser memorandum from Michael Bailey, Allen Jones, and Doug Lindquist to Jim Thomson (HNTB), dated October 8, 1999, presenting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) results for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project (J-4978-14). Reports peak horizontal acceleration (PHA) values for common design return intervals: 0.16 g (72-year), 0.36 g (475-year), 0.47 g (975-year), and
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Burien City Council Item 10G Rejoining the StART" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V