TagNSTP(70)

Zone 3, a citizen group of residents living adjacent to Sea Tac Airport (within the boundaries defined as f’noise remedy progra'n areas” in the Sea Tac Cornnunities Plantt would :Like you to know that-although we would have preferred to see fewer people 'lunder the flight pathl'- we do support the people per acre density gulde- lines for recreational planning of the North Sea Tac Park as re- commended by the FAA, It is difficult to narrow our concerns and reasonings down for the coapatible use of the lands north of Sea Tac , However, i think it most appropriate to use the enclosed items as most per- tin ent facts + 1, From the :DRAFT-E:iS-Sea Tac ComIn'ani ties :Plan 11)lore land under the flight path dedicated tO airport, Clear zones and OPen space use provides extra nargins of safety event of an aircraft mishap, besides lessening human exposure to noise pIt in tfl e , The crigina} Interim! :[,and Acquisition defined in the Memorandum to the Port of Se,att: e Corn:ni ssiori meeting date<:i 9/ 11/73 called !’ a =ortY,er:y =c quis!-tion from our present northern boundary , 146It}, St , , north to So . 14Ct,h St . and lying between Des Moines Way on the west and 24 th A'- e , So , on the east , Include i in tllib WOU-'Ld be approximately 239 acres , including 151 rosS.denses and t};e S=,131 Set JunIOr HIgh School, it --- tIOn closer study 9 it ap- I>eared that…

PROPOSED HIGHLINE AREA REZONE PUBLIC HEARING - April 20, 1981 Testimony - Port of Seattle .. am Oris Dunham, Director of Aviation, Sea-Tac International Airport. The Port of Seattle is the major property owner in the community affected by the proposed Highline area zoning. For the most part, the Port believes the proposed area. zoning reflects proper efforts to insure compatible land use of the property surrounding the Airport. However, one aspect of the Highline Area Zoning Panel's recommendation--the S-R zoning of an area north of the Airport--totally disre- gards the notion of compatible land use and, therefore, must be opposed. The Port also objects, as beyond the County's jurisdiction, to certain proposed zoning and a previously imposed rezone condition relating to Port-owned property on the west side of the Airport. 1. 35-Acre North-End Area: North Issues #15 and #23 (blue) South Issue #33(A) (yellow) North Issue #38 (yellow) 15-Acre North-End Area: South Issue #33B (blue) At the north end of the Airport there is a 35-acre area bounded by 24th Avenue South, South !46th Street, and South 142nd Street. Th~ Port owns approximately 9 acres in this area (plus a 120-foot buffer strip along 24th Avenue South and South 142nd Street) and the remainder of the 35 acres is in private ownership. Under the criteria established in the Sea-Tac/Communi- ties Plan, this area is .. within the highest noise-impact zone. The Port -1- D/5 -: 04/16/81 acquired its approximately 9 acres in 1976-1977 in order to convert the property…

Following our disscussion on 25 July 1979, we have prepared five pre- schematic site plans to indicate to you the numbers of people that may be anticipated at the North Seatac site under a variety of development regimes. You are familiar w~h four of the plans, as we presented these to the FAA on 17 July 1979. ~~~ing preliminary recommendations gi¥fn to us at that time, a second 1Modified Passive11 plan was prepareCW You will find all five plans enclosed. The numbers shown on the plan are derived from published information, previous studies, and our own experience. These plans are a very early phase of master planning and are intended only to provoke disscussion. However, they do reflect our natural process- es and social factors studtes to this point. We have analyzed elements such as soils, hydrology, vegetation, and noise, etc. to determine which areas of the North Seatac site could carry varying recreation development intensities. Our studies have been synthesised into the map labeled Carrying Capacity11 which I have included with the pre-schematics. ' If you have any questions regarding the pre-schematics or the process that lead to the Carrying Capacity plan, please feel free to call-I or Dave McNeal will be glad to help you. Sincerely, ~b Janis Sn~ Legend 1!-'Vv~~ [:JJ HI~ -~ate, -~w E:J To rtnl1in it1 riy IJ% Vuy lfi8h : 'lhe area u wiuble far intensivoe activities that IIIII)' attract c:rowds, require DBlipula::i.al of J...ldfarm, aoils, 'W!get.aticn, ar m-e poU!'lti.ally hig:Uy disruptivoe to .-rvirtrment&l…

J©ngejan - Gerrard - McNeal, inc., PS. [ r .[ [ [ ['': ( F [ f [ [ [ [ [ Port of Seattle Port of Seattle Executive DIrector Mr. Richard D. Ford Port Commissioners Merle D. Adlum Jack S. Block Pau1 S. Friedlander Henry L. Kotk ins Henry T. Simonson Planning and Research Department Dawson A1 exander , Acting Director Ed Parks , Project Manager King County King County Executive Mr. John Spe11man King County Council Pau1 Barden Bob Greive Gary Grant Bruce Laing Lois North Scott Blair Ruby Chow TVb aRt / ni,iAn Bill' Reams King County Department of Planning and Comnuni ty Development Jack Lynch , Director Karen Rahm, Planning Division Manager Jim Webster, Parks Division Manager Harold Robertson, Community Planning Supervisor Davd Baugh, Comnunity Planner King County Design Corrm iss jon FAA - Northwest Region Robert Brown 9 Chief , Airports Division George Saito, Planner Steering Committee Lee Atwood, Chairman Peggy Rus , Secretary Dot:tie Harper, Subcommittee Chairwoman Master Planning Teain Jonge gan{gerrard/McNea1 ) Inc. 1 P. S . - Landscape Architects David McNeal , Princ{pal- In-Charge Janis Snoey, Site Planning/Text7Graph lcs Wendy Anderson , SIte Inventory/GraphIcs Towne, Richards & Chaudiere - Acoustica1 Engineers Roy Richards '’ Rldenour9 Cochran & Lewis - Consu1 ting ArchItects Hi 11 iam Ridenour - Jongejan (;errarc! Mc:Neal 2:+ 1 O:Ir(i Aven lie Northeast Bel it'vut'. Wash rn Eton 98004 (206) 454 572:1January 3, 1980 Mr. Arthur H. Yoshloka Director, Planning and Research Port of Seattle P.0. Box 1209 Seattle,…

AN ORDINANCE adopting the Sea-Tac Conununi tie~ PJab; !·as an addendum to the King County Comprehens;ive I i Plan for the future growth, development and rede- 1 ' ,,,velopment of· Sea-Tac International Airport apd ~he1 surrounding communi ties, , I ! S'FAT~MENT OF' FACTS: . I i 1. The King County Council passed Motion 1019 on NoVi ember 27, ~972, authorizing King County to apply for Federa:l 1 ' . Aviation Administration Planning ·Grant Funds with th~ . Por.t :.of Seattle to conduct ·master pl.nnirtg :for Se~~T~c 1 • ·International Airport and the _surrounding vicinity .. J i 2.. 'fhe application was approved by the Federal A:Viatti):n Administration for a sum of $641,468 on January 28, ~973'_,, .. • I I' "· ' ', I I • I '! i '. 3. The contracted and in- kind portions of that gran'tl ~ave been! satisfactorily accomplisbed. . j !'' ! 4. Community involvement was a: thorough ·and conttnu~·ng! · elf:'ment of the Sea-Tac Communi~ies Plan as certif'ied jby the ~ing. County Policy Development Commission and: doeu·h ment~d in their report "Report ·on Community Invol;vemdnt: in the sea-Tac C~unities Planning Process.!' ! I ! ' . . I' • I 5. King· County has considerable land use controlj in the . :i~~~~~~;lned as_ the vicinity of ~e~-Tac Internatilonalll i i , I 6. ~n Environmental Impact· Statement has· been pr'epaljed: which examines the effects of the Sea-Tac Communilties ! ' Plani · .. I 1 . . • I : .7. The…