SAMP Comments: Stuart Jenner Public Comment on 2024 Draft Environmental Assessment

Seatac Airport neighbor Stuart Jenner submitted public comments in December 2024 criticizing the Port of Seattle's Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), arguing that citizens were given inadequate time to review over 4,000 pages of documents and that an Environmental Impact Statement—not merely an Environmental Assessment—is needed to properly evaluate the plan's effects on nearby residents. Jenner raises concerns about opaque computer models used to claim a nearly 50% increase in passenger traffic would have no environmental impact, shifting baseline comparisons that ignore past promises made during the third runway approval, and the absence of project cost information. He calls on Port Commissioners and the FAA to extend the public comment period and subject the plan to greater independent scrutiny.

Notes

Public comment letter submitted December 13, 2024 by Stuart Jenner, a concerned citizen and Sea-Tac Airport neighbor, on the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) 2024 Draft Environmental Assessment (EA). Jenner criticizes the 53-day comment period for 4,000+ pages of documentation, calls for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) instead of an EA, and argues a nearly 50% increase in passenger traffic cannot be assessed as having no environmental impact. Raises concerns about an opaque computer model (AEDT) used to justify no-impact findings, shifting baselines from the Third Runway permit commitments, lack of project cost disclosures, CO2 and air quality impacts on Puget Sound, traffic congestion, and the Port Of Seattle’s failure to consider demand management through pricing. References the SAMP scoping report, open houses, and a published opinion piece at burien.news.

V V