Comments on SAMP Near-Term Projects Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SEPA No. 2026-01)

Seattle resident David Ortman submitted formal comments on the Port of Seattle's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for its 'Sustainable' Airport Master Plan, arguing that the DEIS fails to adequately address noise and air pollution impacts on surrounding communities, property value effects, and meaningful alternatives to expansion. Ortman criticizes the Port for not issuing a full Sea-Tac EIS in over 30 years and for dismissing alternatives such as relocating airport operations to Joint Base Lewis-McCord. He also demands that airlines, not taxpayers, bear the costs of pollution mitigation, and calls for removal of the word 'sustainable' from a plan he views as promoting unchecked growth at a severely constrained airport.

Notes

Public comment letter dated August 14, 2026, from David E. Ortman (Seattle, WA) to Port Of Seattle Senior Environmental Program Manager Steve Rybolt on the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Near-Term Projects (NTP) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), SEPA No. 2026-01. Ortman critiques the DEIS for failing to address alternatives under RCW 43.21C.030(c)(iii), omitting health and noise impacts beyond the airport perimeter, and ignoring property valuation impacts. Proposes relocating Joint Base Lewis-McCord (JBLM) to Moses Lake and moving Sea-Tac Airport to JBLM served by rapid transit. Raises concerns about the Port’s 30-year gap in issuing EIS documents, the Flight Corridor Safety Program tree removals (800 trees in 2016, 174 trees in 2019 SEPA DNS), FAA verification for tree removal requests, airline responsibility for air and noise pollution mitigation costs, and use of the word ‘sustainable’ in the project name. References Seattle Times article quoting COO Arif Ghouse and The Urbanist projecting 64 million passengers within five years of NTP completion.

V V