A ground crew worker in a high-visibility yellow jacket and face mask stands on an orange ladder to service a United Airlines Boeing 737 (tail number N7233) on the tarmac. A United Airlines ground support vehicle (BL 2744) is visible in the background alongside fueling hoses and equipment.

Notes

Image shows ground crew personnel in high-visibility safety gear conducting aircraft fueling or maintenance operations on the airport tarmac. A worker on a ladder is servicing the aircraft while ground support equipment and fuel trucks are positioned nearby.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message