July 31, 2019 2 pp.

The City of Burien billed the City of Normandy Park $294.70 for services rendered in June 2019 under Interlocal Agreement #18-A101, related to the Shore Acres Master Plan (SAMP), a noise and land-use planning initiative. This is the sixth invoice issued under that agreement, dated July 31, 2019, with payment due by September 12, 2019. The invoice was directed to Ryan Harriman at Normandy Park's SEPA Office, reflecting ongoing intergovernmental cooperation on environmental and noise policy in the Sea-Tac Airport area.

Notes

Invoice #832 dated 07/31/2019 from City of Burien Finance to City of Normandy Park, Attn: Ryan Harriman, SEPA Office, 801 SW 174th St, Normandy Park, WA 98166. Billed under Interlocal Agreement #18-A101, described as ‘SAMP’ Invoice #6 for June 2019. Customer number 74. Invoice total due $294.70, payment due 09/12/2019. Relates to the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Four City Interlocal Agreement between Burien and Normandy Park.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message